Have You Heard? Kevin Martin Dislikes Comcast
FCC Chief Stacks Deck Against Top Operator At Harvard Hearing
By Ted Hearn -- Multichannel News, 3/2/2008 12:01:00 AM
Washington— Federal Communications Commission chairman Kevin Martin dragged his agency all the way to Harvard Law School last Monday to make the same point he’s made in just about every U.S. ZIP code: He dislikes and distrusts Comcast.
The Harvard session was billed a as discussion on broadband network-management practices. Instead, Martin turned it into a federally sanctioned sandbagging of the country’s largest cable company. It didn’t take deep packet inspection to notice that the witness table was stacked against Comcast. Martin, for example, filled three of six seats on the second (and last) panel with cable-bashers from MIT.
Martin’s assault on fair play, performed in broad daylight, was just astounding. One can only imagine what goes on at the Internal Revenue Service and the FBI on days when someone there decides it’s vendetta time.
Martin’s idea of striking a balance was to line up Comcast executive vice president David Cohen against six Comcast-hostile witnesses. Introductory comments in support of net neutrality were spoken by Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and were later echoed by FCC Democrats Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein.
In fact, Copps and Adelstein were so tickled to be in Cambridge, they forgot to reprise their Seattle shtick of condemning Martin for giving them just five business days to prepare.
Cohen, toughened by years of hardball politics in Philadelphia, knew the deal right away.
“It’s a pleasure to be here today as a participant and hopefully not the main course for your meal,” Cohen cracked. His lone source of support was tepid backing from University of Pennsylvania law professor Christopher Yoo.
The FCC is investigating Comcast for allegedly blocking bandwidth-hogging, peer-to-peer BitTorrent traffic. Comcast said it delayed some traffic because abuses by a small minority degraded service for other high-speed data customers at peak times.
“These are very significant issues and we don’t take those allegations lightly,” Martin said. “I think it’s important to understand that the commission is ready, willing and able to step and, if necessary, correct practices that are ongoing today.” Translation: Comcast is lying.
Nor for the first time, Cohen insisted the blocking charge was bogus.
“To be absolutely clear, we do not block any Web sites or online applications, including [peer to peer],” he said.
Martin acted as if Cohen had admitted guilt.
Without reference to any FCC investigative findings, Martin repeatedly deployed the rhetoric and formulations of Comcast’s antagonists. Time and again, Martin used the word “blocked” to describe what took place on Comcast’s broadband network.
Where’s this thing going? That’s easy. Martin wants desperately to brand Comcast an Internet outlaw regardless of the facts, because Martin has decided to inflict regulatory harm on any convenient cable company anytime he can.
Martin has three votes to pull it off, his plus Copps’ and Adelstein’s. Martin probably wants to fine Comcast at least $1 million, if only to secure the attention of The New York Times.
But a fine that big might cost him Adelstein’s support.
-
corrected mostly for formatting
So let me get this straight. The man is chief of a regulatory agency and he has a bias? That bastard! I join you in accusing him of being A HUMAN BEING!
Then, instead of working behind the scenes to arbitrarily inflict his bias in secret, he holds a public hearing in a big room (which still overflowed) and allows everyone to hear the issue. Obviously, open meetings are the new backroom deals.
In the front of the room: All 5 Commissioners, plus Rep. Markley who chairs a House subcommittee covering the subject matter and has an open bill about it.
The Panels: Petitioners Vuze and Free Press, accused P2P-shaper Comcast, accused NARAL-blocker Verizon, noted experts and innovators both both the creation of modern networking and P2P. All sitting side-by-side. Doesn''t Martin know to let "the accused" sit alone so that everyone knows who to ridicule?
Yes, their own expert biases came with the experts -- including those biases of panelists Yoo and Bennett who side with Comcast and Verizon for the most part. Indeed, everyone agreed with Comcast's main assertion -- Reasonable Network Management is a good thing. The real disagreement was revealed -- where to draw the line at Reasonable. Clearly, Martin STACKED THE DECK WITH PEOPLE WHO KNEW THE FACTS AND COULD SUPPLY THEM.
The man is incompetent. He tried to railroad Comcast and, instead, a reasonably fair, totally open public hearing broke out. Obviously, he doesn''t belong in Washington DC deciding regulatory matters.
-- Robb Topolski (and his bias) from Hillsboro, Oregon
Robb Topolski - 3/2/2008 11:15:00 AM EST -
So let me get this straight. The man is chief of a regulatory agency and he has a bias? That bastard! I join you in accusing him of being A HUMAN BEING!
Then, instead of working behind the scenes to arbitrarily inflict his bias in secret, he holds a public hearing in a big room (which still overflowed) and allows everyone to hear the issue. Obviously, open meetings are the new backroom deals.
In the front of the room: All 5 Commissioners, plus Rep. Markley who chairs a House subcommittee covering the subject matter and has an open bill about it.
The Panels: Petitioners Vuze and Free Press, accused P2P-shaper Comcast, accused NARAL-blocker Verizon, noted experts and innovators both both the creation of modern networking and P2P. All sitting side-by-side. Doesn''t Martin know to let "the accused" sit alone so that everyone knows who to ridicule?
Yes, their own expert biases came with the experts -- including those biases of panelists Yoo and Bennett who side with Comcast and Verizon for the most part. Indeed, everyone agreed with Comcast''s main assertion -- Reasonable Network Management is a good thing. YES, that bastard Martin clearly STACKED THE DECK WITH PEOPLE WHO KNEW THE FACTS AND COULD SUPPLY THEM.
The man is incompetent. He tried to railroad Comcast and, instead, a reasonably fair, totally open public hearing broke out. Obviously, he doesn''t belong in Washington DC deciding regulatory matters.
-- Robb Topolski (and his bias) from Hillsboro, Oregon
Robb Topolski - 3/2/2008 11:11:00 AM EST
No related content found.
Featured Company
-
Grab Networks
Created from the merger between Anystream and Voxant Media, Grab Networks offers a comprehensive video operating system and syndication network for profitably publishing video anywhere on the Internet. The system automatically manages, transcodes and tags video assets- turning cl..more
VIEW ALL GALLERIES
