AT&T Needs Property Owners' Consent To Install U-Verse Equipment
Connecticut PUC Says Telco Doesn’t Have ‘Right Of Way’ On Public Ground Near Homes
By Linda Haugsted -- Multichannel News, 5/28/2008 9:50:00 AM
AT&T will have to go back to property owners living near its U-Verse equipment in Connecticut and obtain consent for the hardware placements, according to an order from the state's Department of Public Utility Control.
The DPUC disagreed with AT&T's argument that it has permission to place hardware such as telephony distribution conductors and "equipment" in the rights-of-way. The utility regulators cited state law, which states that utilities can't place hardware on or under any public ground without the consent of abutting property owners and municipalities.
The docket was opened at the urging of the cities of Bridgeport, Stamford and Danbury, which complained about the location of so-called V-RAD boxes. These contain the hardware and battery back-up necessary to operate the telephone company's U-verse video services.
Not only did the DPUC issue the order for retroactive consents on May 27, but on May 28, the state's attorney general, Richard Blumenthal, filed a formal notice with the DPUC to compel AT&T to submit location information on the estimated 2,000 V-RADs in place in the state.
Disclosure of the locations is "imperative to ensure that the rights of all property owners and municipalities are upheld, and their consent obtained. There can be no reasonable objection to this simple request for information that should be readily available," the attorney general said in a prepared statement.
-
> WHich cable company has franchises there and griped?
Probably Cablevision.
Lexie J. - 5/31/2008 5:33:00 AM EDT -
WHich cable company has franchises there and griped?
The Kitchen Sync and New Improved Cable Drano - 5/30/2008 10:39:00 PM EDT -
its amazing how at&t is rolling out this already obsolete VDSL technology AND ruining peoples property at the same time. ponderous.
stan - 5/29/2008 11:36:00 AM EDT
U-Verse Needs Consent
06/01/2008Charter May Appeal UConn Court Case
11/26/2000
