Free Newsletter Subscription
        MCN All Access

Cable Operators: Exclusive Contract Ban Should Go, Too

Comcast, Cablevision Cite Rejection of FCC's 30% Cap As Evidence Agency Exclusive Programming Ban Also Is Flawed

John Eggerton -- Multichannel News, 9/8/2009 1:02:15 PM

Comcast and Cablevision Systems are looking to use a court's smackdown of the Federal Communications Commission's 30% national subscribership cap on cable operators to take a swing at the ban on exclusive programming contracts as well.

That is according to a copy of a Sept. 3 joint filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from attorneys for Cablevision and Comcast, which challenged -- in the same court -- the FCC's most recent extension of the exclusivity ban, in 2007, for another five years.

The FCC has continued to renew the ban, which, like the 30% subscriber cap, was part of the 1992 Cable Act. The ban had a 10-year sunset, but the FCC has kept it in place, arguing that it continued to be necessary to require cable operator-owned networks to be made available to satellite operators on similar terms and conditions. The agency's August 2008 response to the operators' lawsuits is available here.

The Comcast and Cablevision filing cites the 30% decision as evidence the FCC was wrong about the exclusive ban, too.

Cable operator attorneys point out that in the 30% cap decision, which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued two weeks ago, the court said cable operators no longer have the bottleneck power over programming that concerned Congress back when the law was passed in 1992.

Cablevision and Comcast, in previously filed briefs, have argued that as the 30% cap goes -- and in this case, it is gone -- so goes the rule prohibiting exclusive programming contracts.

"Widespread withholding is now implausible," said the attorneys in the filing. "[T]here are proportionally fewer services to withhold. The limited withholding that may still occur will not threaten competition: most vertically integrated services have closely similar substitutes, and, when competitive MVPDs [multichannel video programming distributors] have sunk massive investments, withholding can no longer cause market exit."

Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for Sept. 22.

Comcast and Cablevision declined to comment on the case. An attorney for Cablevision whose name was on the filing said he could not comment.

-- Todd Spangler contributed to this report.

 

 

 

 

Talkback
Related Content

No related content found.

More >>>

Newbay Business Information Resource Center

Featured Company


Most Recent Resources

Advertisement
More Content
  • Voices
  • Photos
  • Podcasts

Todd Spangler

BIT RATE

Todd Spangler
February 9, 2012
Boxee: Who Needs Cable? Actually, We Do
Cut the cord! Save hundreds of dollars a year by not paying for cable TV! Only,...
More

Gary Arlen

As I Was Saying

Gary Arlen
February 7, 2012
Intensifying the Spectrum War
As if the battle for wireless bandwidth isn’t volatile enough already,...
More

Dick Van Dyke at Disney Junior

FREEZE FRAME

Dick Van Dyke visits Disney Junior, VH1's Critics' Choice Awards and more events for the week of Feb. 6.
2012 Tartikoff Legacy Awards

NATPE CONFERENCE 2012

Scenes from the 2012 NATPE Conference, held Jan. 22-25 in Miami.
Showtime at TCA 2

FREEZE FRAME

Showtime's TCA tour, NBCU and Comcast take the ice at the Winter Classic and more events for the week of Jan. 30.
VIEW ALL GALLERIES



Advertisement
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2011 NewBay Media, LLC. 28 East 28th Street, 12th floor, New York, NY 10016 T (212) 378-0400 F (212) 378-0470
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy