Stations Score Retrans Fees
But Analysts Say Payments Could Level Off Soon
By Mike Farrell -- Multichannel News, 3/22/2010 12:32:46 PM
Station groups continued to haul in big retransmission- consent dollars in 2009, with tiny Gray Television reporting a five-fold increase in fees paid by distributors last week. But the train may be slowing going forward, as contracts enter their second cycles, according to some analysts.Atlanta-based Gray, which has 36 stations in 30 smaller markets in the South and Midwest, released preliminary fourth-quarter earnings on March 15, reporting $15.6 million in retransmission-consent revenue in 2009, up 414% over the $3 million it received in 2008.
Gray has been late to the retrans game — it only started breaking out such revenue in 2007 and became more aggressive this year, as it attempted to leverage its ratings weight in many of its markets.
Most other broadcasters had more manageable increases, ranging between 29% and 68% for the year, compared to 25% to 95% increases in 2008.
LEVELING OFF
Benchmark Co. media analyst Edward Atorino believes those increases will continue to level off . “I think the big boom in retrans is probably over going forward,” he said. “I don’t think you are going to see any gigantic ramp-ups from the current levels.”
While no other station group came close to Gray’s percentage gain for the year, retransmission revenue continued to be an important — and still-growing — segment for the publicly traded station groups.
All of the larger groups reported gains, even retrans pioneer Sinclair Broadcast Group, which settled a potential battle with Mediacom Communications in Iowa in January.
In an effort to avoid a lengthy battle, the two agreed on a one-year deal for an undisclosed amount that will expire at the end of 2010.
Sinclair, one of the first broadcast station groups to seek cash for retransmission consent, no longer separates retransmissionconsent revenue from its overall results. On a conference call with analysts in February, Sinclair CEO David Smith said breaking out the number no longer serves a purpose for the broadcaster.
“I think for the last couple of years, we felt that it was important for not only our shareholders to understand what we were accomplishing, but it was probably equally, if not more, important for the entire industry to understand that Sinclair was effectively the leader in getting retransmission dollars from these multichannel fellows,” Smith said on the February call. “And I think it’s fair to say without tooting our horn one iota, that the industry is where it is today in terms of what it gets because of our efforts.
“Now that everybody is essentially feeding at the trough, it’s no longer necessary for us to stand out in front of it all and say, ‘Look how much we get versus everybody else.’ That doesn’t necessarily serve our purpose.”
Although Sinclair declines to break out retrans numbers, Wells Fargo broadcasting and cable analyst Marci Ryvicker estimated the haul for 2009 was about $100.7 million for the company, a 36.3% increase from the previous year.
Atorino said that Sinclair’s decision to downplay its retransmission- consent increases could have other motives.
“They don’t want to antagonize the cable companies,” Atorino said. “Plus, knowing Dave Smith, he doesn’t want Wall Street to focus on the wrong thing.”
For example, Atorino said that while Wall Street is focusing on retrans and possible spectrum auctions, ad revenue is beginning to crawl back at many station groups after years of 20% to 25% declines.
Other station groups continued to report double-digit retrans increases, including Nexstar Broadcasting, which reported retrans revenue of $24.3 million, a 68.5% increase over the previous year. Belo Corp., which owns 20 stations in 16 markets, increased its retrans take by 29% to $42.6 million in 2009 and LIN TV, owner of 27 stations in 17 markets, reported a 48% increase in retrans revenue to $43 million for the year.
NEXSTAR RISING
While Atorino doesn’t expect overall retrans increases to hit the stratosphere, Nexstar, which with Sinclair was one of the pioneers in attracting cash for retransmission consent, said its retrans revenue growth is showing no signs of slowing.
On a conference call with analysts earlier this month, Nexstar CEO Perry Sook said the station group completed several retrans renewal deals in 2009 with robust built-in escalators. He added that the broadcaster has about a dozen deals to complete in 2010, most near the end of the year, which also should bring healthy increases.
“Our retransmission revenues will be up a substantial doubledigit percentage amount again in 2010 as we have escalators in all of our contracts on their anniversary date and by and large those anniversary dates are on a calendar year basis,” Sook said on the conference call. “And looking forward, we will have the full year benefit of all of our new agreements, their escalators and the new per sub rates for 2011 so this will be a growing revenue stream for us continuing into 2011.”
Talkback
-
Another case of The Fleecing of America! We will never learn. Don't expect any help from Washington - they need one another to continue the rape and pillage of the working class' pocket book. Retrans must stop!
Quigley Spargus - 3/30/2010 11:12:57 AM EDT -
with DBS still in the womb in 92, possibly the cable guys got a little arrogant, and got caught with their pants down. so much for foresight.
with the ability for high demand content providers to play cable, dbs, and the telcos, against each other, i see nothing other than not wanting to upset the political apple cart, holding back re-trans fee increases going forward.
who's kidding who? local Fox, NBC, CBS, and ABC, affiliates have exclusive programming that's basically "must have" for multi channel providers.
at the least, any single one of the locals mentioned above individually is a trip wire for a $55 plus basic video package. the "must have" locals not only posses the mkt power of their own programming, but their "must have" status enables them to leverage the entire video package.
at the greatest, their "must have" status makes them the trip wire on a $100-$170 video, internet, voice, bundle, and enables them to leverage the price of the entire bundle as negotiating collateral.
as things are now, the sky is the limit on what they can demand, and probably only not wanting to ruffle Washington, or take too big a bite at once, has kept their asking price at current levels.
but when each of the big 4 locals individually holds that veto power on a $150 triple play bundle, how long before the nets can't refrain themselves from really pushing the envelope, and testing the real leverage of that "veto/trip wire" status?
other than regulating fees, or eliminating the consent side of retrans consent, i see only the prospective threat of regulation or elimination keeping fees from going through the roof. and sooner or later these locals will be embolden to even the prospect of that threat, and won't be able to contain themselves from exploring just how far they can leverage that trip wire status over the entire bundle.
ultimately, i can see nothing short of regulation or the elimination of consent, holding back the relative absolute power the "must have" locals now posses.
question is, how far will it go before Washington accepts the inevitable, as inevitable, and steps in.
on a side note, who would have ever thought the reality of the elimination of the "locals" as free tv, could have been executed without the general public even realizing it had happened?
or that those locals would in the not so distant future, barring an intervention, likely become their most expensive channels?
yet that is today's and tomorrow's reality, and for the most part, the general public is still totally unaware that what went down, went down.
Roger Drummer - 3/25/2010 7:55:59 PM EDT
No related content found.
Featured Company
-
Digital Rapids
Digital Rapids is the leading provider of professional hardware and software tools, technology and expertise for bringing video to wider audiences and new viewing platforms. Continuing to set new standards in quality, productivity and versatility, our solutions span the critical ..more



















