CWA: Verizon Trying To Scare Strikers With Health-Care Alerts
Telco Says It Will Cut Off Coverage on Aug. 31, Per Previous Contract
By Todd Spangler -- Multichannel News, 8/17/2011 2:01:46 PM
Verizon Communications is notifying 45,000 striking union employees that it will cut off health-care coverage effective Aug. 31 for those still on the picket line, a step the Communications Workers of America called a scare tactic.
Union-represented Verizon employees in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions have been on strike since Aug. 7. CWA represents about 33,000 Verizon workers, while the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers represents some 12,000.
This week Verizon began notifying striking employees that their health-care coverage will be terminated if they are still off the job at the end of the month.
"Verizon is trying to scare workers," CWA communications director Candice Johnson said in a statement. According to Johnson, in some past strike situations, Verizon has not threatened to cut off health care for workers "at least not at this point in negotiations."
Verizon spokesman Rich Young said the company sent the letters "because we started getting questions from employees. This is standard procedure."
Under federal COBRA regulations, Verizon employees can extend their health-care coverage for between $4,800 to $10,000 per year for individual plans or $10,000 to $20,000 for family plans. "The unions have said they'll help cover those costs. We hope they do," Young said.
According to Young, the 2008 contract between Verizon and the unions stipulated that in the event of a strike the company would not be responsible for health-care coverage after Aug. 30, 2011.
"It was clearly stated in the contract that the union bosses approved. The union bosses are well aware of this provision," Young said in an e-mail.
On the 11th day of the contentious strike, Verizon and the unions again were scheduled to meet in Rye Brook, N.Y., and Philadelphia.
According to Young, "there's been progress made on some issues" but he declined to elaborate.
Verizon is seeking a number of concessions from the CWA and IBEW, including requiring workers to pay health-care premiums, having more flexible work rules, reducing sick days, eliminating job-security provisions and freezing pensions (while the company would match up to 9% of salary toward workers' 401(k) plans).
The unions claim that Verizon's demands, taken together, would cost union members $20,000 annually.
-
Randy, did you fall off of a pole? This company could release any non-union person with a blink of the eye. They have no protection. Yes, it would be nice to have the abiliity to switch jobs, but they have no protection! Most of them know without the union, they wouldn't reap all the benefits they receive. I worked 30 some years ago for this company. I wasn't paid well. I didn't have job security,and worked through the divesiture where you could go to AT&T. Thank God I didn't. My friends got fired after 6 mos. and returned to Bell. They lost senority. Be thankful for what you have!!!!!!
Barb Hogan - 8/20/2011 12:03:18 PM EDT -
It's time to dissolve these unions! The business landscape has changed dramatically especially with Verizon. I am a member of the CWA not by choice as I work on the landline side. I would jump at an opportunity to work on the wireless side as there is no union! The union was necessary in its day to protect and represent employees however that is not the case any longer. If you pull your own weight and perform your job responsibly a union is not needed!
Randy Green - 8/18/2011 7:47:53 AM EDT
No related content found.





















