Martin Opposed To Cable's DTV Quiet Period
FCC Chairman Still Supports Late January Deadline
By Ted Hearn -- Multichannel News, 11/11/2008 2:57:00 AM
Washington -- The cable industry's campaign to stop TV stations from pulling their signals as the nation converts to digital broadcasting is stalled at the Federal Communications Commission mainly because of chairman Kevin Martin's opposition.
For months, the cable industry has sought a "quiet period" that would begin no later than Dec. 31, a deadline which would prevent many TV stations from withholding their signals in the weeks leading up to the Feb. 17, 2009 analog-to-digital transition mandated by federal law.
But Martin said Monday that he would support a quiet period that began only in late January, which in theory would allow disputes that began in late 2008 to rage up to and beyond Feb. 17.
"I think [the quiet period] is important as you approach the DTV transition, but I don't think we should be using the DTV transition as an excuse to be interfering with the normal contractual negotiations that are occurring," Martin told reporters Monday.
Martin took a few questions from reporters attending an event at the Newseum to start the 100-day countdown to Feb. 17.
The cable industry wants the quiet period to start before thousands of retransmission- consent contracts expire on Dec. 31. Every three years, TV stations have the right to demand compensation or free carriage from cable systems.
Martin said his late-January date would "make sure the we stabilize what the number of channels were available [on Feb. 17]."
Martin circulated his plan but he didn't have enough support to pass it.
The other four FCC commissioners have voted to seek public comment on a variety of quiet period dates. But Martin has yet to vote for it, which would start the public comment process.
"The other commissioners want to put out a further notice of proposed rulemaking first. I think we will be putting out a notice and we'll consider what to do then," Martin said.
The National Association of Broadcasters has endorsed a one-month voluntary quiet period that wouldn't begin until Feb. 4, 2009, a proposal rejected by the head of cable's largest trade association.
"Many retransmission-consent agreements expire at the end of 2008; the NAB's proposal to commence a quiet period only in early February 2009 therefore is nothing more than a hollow gesture," National Cable & Telecommunications Association president Kyle McSlarrow said in a statement last month.
-
If Martin does not do something soon about a quiet period, it will be too late for small operators. We are being bullied by the Sinclair's of the world. We get told you either pay us what we want or we will charge you more if you miss our price deadline. Sinclair did this before and is once again doing the same thing. We are not large enough to stop them. It is kind of like money talks and we all have to eat their BS. With Martins lack of action to help the small companies, it is high time for him to leave his post and have someone in that position that cares about what this is doing to the public with higher rates due to greed from the programmers charging for a signal that is delivered free to the public airways.
Don Whipple - 11/18/2008 11:02:00 PM EST -
Lil'Kev, shouldn't you be packing boxes? Take a look around - everyone (sans broadcasters) are on board with a quiet period. Good god man, if you were any more transparent Wonder Woman would employ you as her pilot for the invisible jet. Can't wait until you too are invisible.
Quigley Spargus - 11/17/2008 1:02:00 PM EST
Cable Shuns NAB’s ‘Quiet Period’ Plan
08/17/2008Dish: TV Stations Seeking 200% Fee Hike
08/27/2008FCC’s Martin Balks At Quiet Period
11/16/2008Dish Cites Hefty Retrans Demands
08/29/2008
