Cablevision’s Network DVR Fight Builds At Supreme Court
Media Companies, Sports Leagues Fil Amicus Briefs Supporting Plaintiffs
By Todd Spangler -- Multichannel News, 11/9/2008 4:15:00 AM
The media companies that sued Cablevision Systems over its planned network-based digital video recorder have won support from other content owners and groups in asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a lower-court decision that the MSO's service didn't amount to copyright infringement.
Last week, several media companies, sports leagues and organizations filed amicus (“friend of the court”) briefs in support of plaintiffs Turner Broadcasting System, ABC, CBS, NBC, 20th Century Fox and Disney Enterprises.
The case involves Cablevision's plans to offer a remote-storage DVR, or RS-DVR, that would allow subscribers to record and play back cable programs without having an actual DVR in their home. Instead, those time-shifting functions would occur in the headend.
Media companies sued Cablevision in 2006 to block the RS-DVR, which was never commercially launched. A federal district court ruling against the MSO was reversed by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Aug. 5.
On Oct. 6, the plaintiffs filed a petition with the Supreme Court seeking a review of the 2nd Circuit's ruling. In their request, the media companies said the appeals-court ruling “fundamentally destabilizes copyright law” and asserted that the lower court misinterpreted copyright laws.
Then on Nov. 5, more than a dozen parties filed friend-of-the-court briefs in support of the petitioners, including MGM, Major League Baseball, the National Football League, the NCAA, Sony BMG Music Entertainment and Warner Music Group.
The 2nd Circuit ruling, by allowing Cablevision to deliver programming for a separate RS-DVR fee, “contravenes clear congressional intent” with respect to the cable compulsory-licensing plan of the 1976 Copyright Act requiring simultaneous retransmission, according to one of the amicus briefs filed Nov. 5.
Another was filed by the nonprofit Copyright Alliance, whose 40-plus members include Viacom, CBS, NBC Universal, Microsoft, MLB, the NFL, the Motion Picture Association of America, NASCAR, Time Warner and the Walt Disney Co.
However, two members of the Copyright Alliance — AT&T and the National Association of Broadcasters — are not supporting the petition because they believe the decision “was correctly decided,” according to the brief.
Asked to comment on the Supreme Court filings, Cablevision said in a statement: “We are confident in the legality of remote-storage DVR and are proceeding with our development plans.”
Cablevision has until Dec. 5 to respond to the petition. The Supreme Court will decide probably in early to mid January whether it will take the case, according to lawyers involved with it. The docket number for the petition is 08-448.
-
First, to answer the question below, they're afraid of losing advertising revenue from the replay. When you go to their website and view a previously broadcast program, they get web ad revenue either from the banners surrounding the programming or embedded in the stream which will play at various intervals.
Beyond that, it's about control. But I'm not sure why myself. Whether the recording is in my home or on a network device shouldn't matter. In fact, the content providers should be asking for much more reporting that could be gained by having this service running. They could then know exactly who requested, who recorded and who watched their programs down to the converter. Privacy aside, they can get much more granular in their knowledge of stats. Of course Neilsen would have a problem with that and then of course the data cuts both ways; they can't fudge, er, estimate their viewership that may affect their broadcast ad revenue.
"All the major networks allow me to download and view shows, free of charge, once the show has been broadcast. So why are they complaining about someone else doing this?"
Joe Cable - 11/11/2008 8:53:00 AM EST -
I often wonder about cases like this.. All the major networks allow me to download and view shows, free of charge, once the show has been broadcast.
So why are they complaining about someone else doing this? I mean.. I hear of radio and television stations suing bars and stores and other businesses when they play the station's programming... Myself, I'd not sue them I'd ask them to apply for a license,, and I'd be making out the the license as I made the request. I mean YOU WANT LISTENERS/VIEWERS right.. So why not let people record and count the viewers for you?
John - 11/10/2008 2:37:00 PM EST
No related content found.
VIEW ALL GALLERIES
