Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Multichannel News
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email

FCC: Set-Top Fines Max Out at $325K

By Todd Spangler -- Multichannel News, 2/18/2007 7:00:00 PM

Federal Communications Commission officials said fines to cable operators not in compliance with the July 1 ban on deploying set-top boxes with integrated security features would not exceed $325,000.

Big and small cable operators are growing increasingly concerned about the impending set-top ban, which will force cable to use removable security mechanisms for digital set-tops. And the FCC had not previously indicated what the penalty would be for not complying.

The FCC's Media Bureau, asked by a reporter what the penalty would be for violating the set-top ban, referred to Section 1.80(b)(1) of the agency's rules, which describes penalties for violating FCC orders.

According to the document, fines for cable operators “shall not exceed $32,500” for each violation or each day of a continuing violation, with a maximum total fine of $325,000 for any continuing violation.

Questions remain, though, including whether the FCC would consider every set-top box that includes integrated security deployed after July 1 as a separate violation.

The purpose of the set-top rule is to ensure cable networks are accessible to consumer-electronics devices by making operators use the same conditional-access technologies themselves. Initially, that will mean using operator-issued CableCards, hardware that plugs into set-tops, TVs or other electronic gear to handle authorization and decryption of cable programming.

Cable companies and the National Cable & Telecommunications Association call the ban unnecessary and a hefty financial burden. Several multiple-system operators — including Comcast, the U.S.'s largest MSO — have requested waivers to the ban for low-end set-tops with integrated security functions.

On Jan. 10, the Media Bureau turned down Comcast's request to have Motorola's DCT-700, Scientific Atlanta's Explorer 940, and Pace Micro Technology's Chicago boxes exempt from the ban, saying the boxes don't meet the definition of “low-cost, limited capability” devices because they include two-way functionality to access services like video on demand.

Comcast in a Jan. 30 letter asked the FCC's five commissioners to review that “fatally flawed” decision. The Consumer Electronics Association last week urged the FCC to reject that appeal.

The FCC did grant a waiver request to Cablevision Systems, which uses removable smart cards in SA boxes. It hasn't ruled yet on a waiver request from RCN for the Motorola DCT-700.

On Feb. 13, RCN sent the agency a letter expressing “very serious concern” about the denial of Comcast's waiver and emphasizing that denying RCN's waiver would result in “significant” price increases to consumers for basic digital cable.

RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email
Talkback
Related Content
Reed Business Information Resource Center

Featured Company


Related Resources

Advertisement

Related Microsite Content

Related Links

More Content
  • Voices
  • Photos
  • Podcasts

Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

VIEW ALL VOICES RSS
HALL OF FAME WELCOME

2009 CABLE HALL OF FAME

Some snapshots from the 2009 Cable Hall of Fame induction, part of Cable Connection-Fall in Denver on Oct. 27.
HIGH ACHIEVER

2009 ACC FORUM

The Association of Cable Communicators headed west from Washington, D.C., to Denver as its 2009 Forum and Beacon Awards ceremony became part of Cable Connections-Fall festivities.
Curtain Rises

CTAM SUMMIT: DAY ONE

Snapshots from day one of CTAM Summit '09 in Denver. Photos by John Staley.

Fall 2009 Hispanic Guide
Advertisement
Multichannel Subscription
NEWSLETTERS
Multichannel Newswire
HD Update
Cable Technology
VOD Newsletter
Hispanic TV Update
HD Programming
Multicultural Newsletter
B&C NewsCentral
Television Careers



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites