Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to MCN Magazine
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

De La Hoya Loss Floors Cable Ops

By R. THOMAS UMSTEAD -- Multichannel News, 6/26/2000

The June 17 Oscar De La Hoya-Shane Mosley pay-per-view bout was a financial and athletic success.

But it left some industry observers worried that the outcome-a De La Hoya loss-could tarnish a popular PPV draw.

The fight generated 700,000 buys and earned $37 million in PPV revenue, TVKO senior vice president Mark Taffet said. Operators put the buy count at closer to 625,000 to 650,000.

Taffet said the fight would be the second-highest-grossing nonheavyweight fight in PPV history, behind the $64 million generated in last September's De La Hoya-Felix Trinidad fight. The artistic success of the exciting match action also bodes well for a rematch and for the image of PPV boxing.

"The fight met our PPV expectations, but in the ring, it substantially exceeded our expectations," Taffet said. "When you get two world-class fighters at the top of their game giving their best effort, the industry benefits."

The rematch would certainly be a lucrative PPV event. But some operators are concerned that De La Hoya's image and PPV attractiveness may have taken a hit with the loss to Mosley.

While De La Hoya is currently the biggest PPV-boxing draw, losses to Trinidad and Mosley may have hurt his stature among boxing fans, which could affect future PPV sales. Another loss to Mosley could really damage his marquee value.

"If there are any future fights for De La Hoya, it's based on the next Mosley fight," boxing analyst and WFAN New York sports-radio host Tony Paige said. "If [De La Hoya] wins, he moves on. If he loses, I think he retires."

But Taffet feels that the performance only enhanced both boxers' reputations and should bolster the performance of the rematch and future bouts.

"If they fight again, I don't think either fighter loses any luster," Taffet said. "Instead, they're elevated to an even higher level [of awareness]."

TVKO and In Demand LLC have a two-fight deal that included a rematch provision if De La Hoya lost.

After the fight, De La Hoya intimated that he was considering retiring, but Taffet said TVKO was already negotiating with both boxers for a rematch.

Operators hope for a September De La Hoya event, but the fight may be pushed to October or even to January 2001.

"Because of the intensity level and competitive nature of the first fight, the Sept. 9 date is too soon to get back into the ring," Taffet said.

Some operators said they were disappointed by the fight's performance, although operators on the West Coast reported stellar buy-rates. De La Hoya and Mosley are both from the Los Angeles area.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

PRODUCT WIRE




 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Voices
  • Photos
  • Podcasts

Voices


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

  • Cable Hall of Fame
    Six cable industry leaders were inducted into the Cable Hall of Fame last week during a ceremony held in conjunction with The Cable Center’s Cable Days at the Colorado Convention Center in Denver.
  • History Wraps Up NYC Subway
    To promote the third season of its hit series ‘Cities of the Underworld,’ History executed the first-ever full advertising wrap of the exterior and interior of a New York City subway car.
  • DCI Rings In Debut on NASDAQ Exchange
    Discovery Communications executives and several on-air personalities from across Discovery’s networks rang the opening bell at the NASDAQ stock exchange to commemorate the first day of trading as a public company.

Podcasts

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Multichannel Newswire
MCN HD Update
MCN Cable Technology
MCN Local Cable Advertising Sales
MCN Hispanic Television Update
MCN HD Programming
Multichannel Multicultural Newsletter
Multichannel Friday First Read
©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites