Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to MCN Magazine
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Deal or No Deal: Dolan Bid May be Stymied

Unhappy Holders Could Stuff Plan To Go Private

By Mike Farrell -- Multichannel News, 5/7/2007

In this story:
WINDFALL WATCH
VICTIMS OF SUCCESS
Sidebars:
Who Could Cash In If Cablevision Is Sold
Rainbow Asset Sale Could Finance Bid

With approval from a special transaction committee of independent directors in hand, Cablevision Systems’ Dolan family may believe its $36.26-per-share offer to take the cable company private is a slam dunk.

But the $10.6 billion deal — and the hopes of founder and chairman Charles Dolan, as well as CEO James Dolan — could be stuffed instead by what appears to be growing dissent among shareholders who must sign off on the transaction.

According to Cablevision, the Dolan buyout would have to pass muster with a “majority of the minority” of shareholders not affiliated with the family. No date has been set at this time for such a vote.

One such shareholder — Mario Gabelli, chairman of Gamco Investors, which holds about 20 million shares of Cablevision stock, or 8.5% of outstanding shares — wouldn’t reveal his voting intentions, but appears to be on the fence. Gabelli could be a critical shareholder for the Dolans to court. According to merger documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, one of the conditions of the Dolan deal is that “the total number of dissenting shares shall not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A Stock immediately prior to the filing of the Merger Certificate.” According to Gabelli, that means the deal could be terminated if more than 10% of shareholders dissent.

The Dolan family currently owns 20% of Cablevision’s equity and 74% of its voting power.

Gabelli said the Dolans’ offer values the entire company at about $22 billion, or between 10.5 times and 11 times 2007 cash flow — a low mark, in his view, considering the other assets in the mix, including Rainbow Media Holdings and the Madison Square Garden unit.

“We think we’ve got $4.5 billion of value,” Gabelli said. “You are entitled as entrepreneurs to a piece of that. And I’m not opposed to giving a couple of billion, but I’m not so sure I want to vote in favor of $4.5 billion.”

Salvatore Muoio, principal and chief investment officer of S. Muoio & Co., a New York based securities-advisory firm which owns Cablevision shares, echoed the sentiment. “It’s not a layup that you vote for it, from my perspective,” Muoio said.

The Dolans received approval of their proposal from the special committees on May 2, the same entity that rejected the family’s past two offers to take the company private. As part of the deal, the Dolans will contribute about $2.1 billion in equity to the new private entity, funding the rest of the deal with $15.5 billion in debt financing from Merrill Lynch & Co., Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., and Bank of America.

WINDFALL WATCH

Investors such as Gabelli and Muoio have weathered past rough times at Cablevision, including subpar financial performance and the sometimes-erratic stewardship of James Dolan. Having stuck with the company through that, they are angered that the Dolans are attempting to take Cablevision private just as they were beginning to reap the benefits of the company’s recent stellar operating performance.

And they are also upset that going private would lock them out of the huge potential windfall of an eventual sale of the cable systems to Time Warner Cable or Comcast, two large multiple-system operators who would likely pay large sums to pick up Cablevision’s New York-area systems.

Granted, Cablevision shareholders have seen their holdings appreciate nicely in the past three years. The stock was up 23% in 2006 — a 66% gain, if a $10-per-share special cash dividend issued that year is factored in — and the shares have more than doubled in price, from $17.71 a share Jan. 2, 2003 to $35.90 a share on May 2, 2007.

Between 2003 and 2006, annual revenue grew 9% a year, from $4.2 billion to $5.9 billion. Annual adjusted operating cash flow rose 13.3% a year, from $1.1 billion to $1.8 billion.

That growth continued in the first quarter of this year, with cable revenue and cash flow up 15.4% and 12%, respectively, from the prior year. Free cash flow — cash flow after capital expenditures and interest payments are made — in the first quarter was $81 million, a $186 million swing from the $105 million free cash flow deficit in the same period last year.

It is that free-cash-flow growth, and expectations that it could expand exponentially over the next two years, that has some analysts doubting that the deal will be approved.

VICTIMS OF SUCCESS

In a research report, Sanford Bernstein cable analyst Craig Moffett wrote that the Dolan offer — somewhere between 10.5 times and 11 times estimated 2007 cash flow — could be seen as well short of the true value of the company.

“Once again, Cablevision — or, at least, the Dolans — may prove to be victims of their own success,” Moffett wrote.

Pali Research media analyst Richard Greenfield was more blunt. In a report titled Just Say No to Chuck and Jim, Greenfield urged shareholders to vote against the deal, claiming that in a year the Dolan family could pay as high as $50 per share to take Cablevision private, based on his free-cash-flow estimates.

Greenfield estimated that Cablevision could end this year with $413 million in free cash flow, compared to the $75 million it generated in all of 2006. In 2008, Greenfield estimated that free cash flow will nearly double to $764 million.

“The Dolans want to harvest Cablevision’s free cash flow for their own personal benefit, while enabling themselves to capture 100% of the profits from an eventual sale to Time Warner,” Greenfield wrote in his report.

That “eventual” sale to Time Warner was also a concern to Muoio, who lamented the lack of a public “stub” in the deal. With such a stub, a portion of the company would remain public to allow current investors to participate in a future sale of the cable assets.

“It’s a great business, it’s got a long way to go, you’re just entering a phase where free cash [flow] is going to start to get a lot larger,” Muoio said. “You want to participate in that. You want to participate in the sale to Time Warner.”

Gabelli said that a public stub would be a major plus for shareholders but for one reason: the Dolans want nothing to do with the public markets.

“The Dolans don’t want to deal with the public [markets],” Gabelli said. “They love me, but they don’t love me.”

Gabelli added he is pleased with the returns he has received on his Cablevision stock — he claims he “stood up and cheered” after Cablevision declared the $10-a-share cash dividend last year — but the deal as it stands appears to heavily favor the Dolans.

This is the Dolan family’s third attempt in two years to take the company private. Its first offer in 2005, for $21 per share, was rejected as too low. In 2006, the family upped the ante to $27 per share and later increased its bid to $30 each, only to be rejected again by the special committee.

This time, Cablevision decided to go directly to the source in crafting another bid, reaching out to former investment banker Thomas Reifenheiser and State University of New York Chancellor John Ryan — the two members of the special committee — at the cable company’s annual board meeting in Palm Beach, Fla., in March, according to a report in The New York Times. In a private meeting, the Dolans pressed the two men for an indication of what price would ultimately be accepted. According to the Times, after consulting with investment advisers Lehman Bros. and Morgan Stanley, a $10.6 billion price tag was agreed upon.

Now all that is left is to reach the same consensus with shareholders.

 

Who Could Cash In If Cablevision Is Sold

While speculation about a Cablevision Systems sale to Time Warner Cable has been parlor conversation in the cable industry for years, any suitor for the company may have to bake another $200 million into its purchase price if it wants to jettison top management.

A good chunk of that would go to Cablevision CEO James Dolan and his father, chairman and founder Charles Dolan, according to an amended 10-K annual report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30.

James Dolan would pocket more than $64 million, including $12 million in severance, $30.8 million in unvested restricted-stock awards, $8.4 million in performance awards and $3.6 million as part of a four-year consulting arrangement, if he were terminated in a change of control, according to that document. Charles Dolan would receive $28.5 million upon termination, including $16.7 million in unvested restricted stock and $5.4 million in performance awards.

Rounding out the potential payouts are vice chairman Hank Ratner ($50.7 million); chief operating officer Tom Rutledge ($44.2 million); and chief financial officer Michael Huseby ($8.2 million). Grand total: $195.6 million.

Cablevision noted in the filing that these payments are heavily weighted with accelerated long-term incentive stock awards, which have accumulated value over several years. They also assume the executives would be terminated in a change of ownership.

While that won’t happen in the Dolan family’s current plan to take the company private, if the cable company is eventually sold — and most analysts believe that is just a matter of time — it is unlikely a new owner would keep all of Cablevision’s top management.

And even if the Dolans were retained in a change of control, James Dolan would still be eligible to receive $12.25 million in performance incentive awards and deferred compensation. Charles Dolan would pocket $6.25 million in performance incentives and deferred comp, according to the 10-K.

Cablevision said the detailed filing was made because of new SEC rules on disclosing executive compensation.

“Cablevision performance in 2006 was extraordinary,” said senior vice president for media and community relations Charles Schueler. “Cablevision’s executive compensation reflects excellence in both operating performance and shareholder returns and is fully appropriate.”

— Mike Farrell

Rainbow Asset Sale Could Finance Bid

If the Dolan family’s $10.6 billion offer to take Cablevision Systems private prevails, the next question isn’t which assets will be sold — most investors and analysts believe that will be its Rainbow Media Holdings programming arm and, eventually, the cable assets — but when.

First up, they said, is most likely Rainbow. Rainbow, minus its Madison Square Garden unit — consisting of the New York arena, MSG Network and the New York Knicks, New York Rangers and New York Liberty professional-sports teams — has been on and off the block for years.

Valued at about $3 billion to $4 billion, a sale of Rainbow’s national networks (AMC, IFC and WE) could help the Dolans finance the $15.5 billion debt the family will take on to finance the privatization deal.

Cablevision has spent the past few months cleaning up the asset — moving the struggling music channel Fuse to MSG and selling off its interests in two regional sports networks outside the New York area to Comcast for $570 million. (See story, page 8.)

The most likely suitor for Rainbow is Liberty Media, according to several analysts and investors, which has shown a desire to beef up its programming assets (see interview with Liberty CEO Greg Maffei, p. 40).

Rainbow, according to one investment banker who asked not to be named, would either be sold in conjunction with the closing of the going-private transaction or spun off as part of a later deal to sell the cable assets to Time Warner Cable. Time Warner has long lusted after Cablevision’s assets, which abut its own New York City system.

While there could be some tax issues if Time Warner Cable were to strike a Cablevision deal before the March 1, 2008 one-year anniversary of its spinoff as a separate public stock from Time Warner Inc., at least one Cablevision investor thinks a deal can be done sooner.

“There are too many financial engineers in New York that are overpaid that can figure out how to do both — give Time Warner’s tax people what they want and my clients, who are Cablevision shareholders, what they want,” said Gamco Investors chairman Mario Gabelli.

On its first quarter conference call last Wednesday, Time Warner chairman Richard Parsons reiterated his company’s interest in the systems if they ever come up for sale, adding, “We would certainly want to be on their list of people to talk to.”

— Mike Farrell

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

PRODUCT WIRE




 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Voices
  • Photos
  • Podcasts

Voices

  • Todd Spangler
    BIT RATE

    December 2, 2008
    Canoe: Rowing As Fast As They Can
    New York -- David Verklin, his hyper-enthusiasm apparently still unchecked, said Canoe Ventur...
    More
  • Todd Spangler
    BIT RATE

    November 25, 2008
    Blue Tube
    Are cable TV's best customers severely depressed individuals, who are literally addicted to t...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

  • Cable Hall of Fame
    Six cable industry leaders were inducted into the Cable Hall of Fame last week during a ceremony held in conjunction with The Cable Center’s Cable Days at the Colorado Convention Center in Denver.
  • History Wraps Up NYC Subway
    To promote the third season of its hit series ‘Cities of the Underworld,’ History executed the first-ever full advertising wrap of the exterior and interior of a New York City subway car.
  • DCI Rings In Debut on NASDAQ Exchange
    Discovery Communications executives and several on-air personalities from across Discovery’s networks rang the opening bell at the NASDAQ stock exchange to commemorate the first day of trading as a public company.

Podcasts

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Multichannel Newswire
MCN HD Update
MCN Cable Technology
MCN Local Cable Advertising Sales
MCN Hispanic Television Update
MCN HD Programming
Multichannel Multicultural Newsletter
Multichannel Friday First Read
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites