Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Most Commented On
Archives
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (1)
FiOS Phantoms?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market | As of Jan. 11 | As of June 11 |
| Dallas | 73,095 | 104,515 |
| Tampa | 56,644 | 90,872 |
| L.A. | 19,203 | 42,465 |
| D.C./Baltimore | 50,941 | 102,748 |
| N.Y./N.J. | 24,468 | 100,322 |
| Boston | 17,640 | 40,154 |
| Philadelphia | 4,406 | 48,849 |
| Richmond, Va. | N/A | 7,049 |
| Norfolk, Va. | N/A | 4,164 |
How many of these are phantom, sort-of-but-not-yet customers, and how many are real?
Clearly, there's something fishy going on here, because Verizon publicly reported having 515,000 FiOS TV subs as of June 30. The total from the table above for June 11 comes to 541,138.
It appears Verizon has gotten ahead of itself, if these documents are genuine. Here's another question: How many "pending" customers churned away before the FiOS truck could show up?
[Update: Verizon director of media relations Sharon Cohen-Hagar sent me a statement that said, in part: "The TV subscriber numbers that we provide to Wall Street reflect actual, billable subscriber accounts, and do not include pending orders, as Digital Art alleges." She also said the lawsuit "represents nothing more than a misguided effort to use litigation tactics to obtain leverage" in a commercial dispute between Digital Art Services and Viamedia, Verizon's local ad-sales contractor. ]
Posted by Todd Spangler on October 4, 2007 | Comments (1)
These claims against Verizon are without merit. The lawsuit arises out of a commercial dispute between Digital Art Services and Viamedia, our local ad sales contractor. It represents nothing more than a misguided effort to use litigation tactics to obtain leverage in that dispute. The TV subscriber numbers that we provide to Wall Street reflect actual, billable subscriber accounts, and do not include pending orders, as Digital Art alleges. -- Sharon Cohen-Hagar, Verizon