Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to MCN Magazine
Levi Maaia   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (6)


HD Growing Pains
November 20, 2006

This holiday shopping year had high expectations for technology vendors but uncertainty about computer upgrades -- with Windows Vista looming, HD set-top wars and digital rights management has put the breaks not only on PC sales, but it could put a damper on HD growth in the cable market, as well.

The digital-video-recorder wars have been on for some time. TiVo, longtime DVR leader, remains at the top of the heap, although it has only recently introduced a high-definition box, which works as a sidecar to a cable or satellite converter.Satellite has had integrated HD DVR technology for a bit longer but few DirecTV subscribers have been willing to foot the expensive upfront cost of this first-generation HD equipment.

Cable companies such as Full Channel have had the option to launch HD DVRs from Motorola, but at their own risk, since the hardware/software combination was less than perfect. Small cable operators have been waiting (not so) patiently for Motorola to improve the DCT-6412 HD DVR.Full Channel chose not to launch the 6412 HD DVR.Having had three 6412’s fail in my own home during testing, it seemed that the potential risks -- financial loss from truck rolls, tarnished consumer reputation from the headaches of troubleshooting the box -- outweighed the gains of being able to say, “We have an HD DVR, too!”

We decided to launch a standard-definition TiVo sidecar last year.It wasn’t high-definition, but the failure rate has proved to be far below that of the 6412.

Finally the summer of ’06 brought the good news of the Motorola DCT-6416, which promised to resolve the many pesky reliability issues of its predecessor. No sooner was it available to independent cable operators through the National Cable Television Cooperative, that it was announced to be obsolete -- doomed before it even left the shipping dock. An FCC ruling on competitive cable converters earlier this year promises to allow other vendors into the set-top converter market by forcing the current players (Motorola and Scientific Atlanta) to eliminate the integration of authorization circuitry within the box.

This is a great idea, but like growing pains, the “HD pains” from the transition have been sharp and unexpected. The FCC’s timeline essentially kills current technology before its replacement arrives in the marketplace, leaving operators and consumers with fewer options for high definition this holiday season.

I suppose we’ll wait (patiently) for the next generation of separable security set-tops, which will hopefully bring diversity to the HD set-top market, just in time for, hmmm … the Fourth of July shopping season?


Posted by on November 20, 2006 | Comments (6)


November 20, 2006
In response to: HD Growing Pains
Davis Freeberg commented:

I'm not sure that calling the TiVo series 3 a sidecar is a very accurate description. Because of it's cable card technology, the box is designed to replace the cable box, not work with it. The series 2 needs a cable company converter if you subscribe to digital channels, but the series 3 is the first independent box to bring diversity to the market.




November 20, 2006
In response to: HD Growing Pains
phord commented:

Killed before it left the dock? Surely, you jest. The separable security is requiring all the settop makers to retool their lines, but that doesn't mean they have to start over from scratch. And it also doesn't mean that your 6412 HD is going to stop working in July. It only means that any boxes sold to the MSOs after 07-07 will have to have the separable security feature. And I'm pretty sure Motorola will have a 6412 descendant which supports that feature.




November 20, 2006
In response to: HD Growing Pains
Levi commented:

Phord, certainly I agree that a replacement is on the way and it will be based on existing technology. The technology hasn't been killed but for cable company order planning purposes we don't know what we will be ordering for Q1 and Q2 '07 and at what cost. Typically a product is made obsolete by the availability of its replacement, not by federal mandate...so I guess we'll just wait and see.




November 21, 2006
In response to: HD Growing Pains
Lloyd commented:

I have had a 6412 for almost a year and have had no problems with it. Don't condemn all of them just because some people have had problems!





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:


Advertisement

Advertisements





©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites