Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Multichannel News

Cablers Turn on the Bandwidth Meters

February 4, 2009

Cable companies are hyping their blistering-fast DOCSIS 3.0 services, which leave DSL gasping in the dust.

But the operators don’t want broadband subscribers to use those big, fat pipes too much.

Time Warner Cable plans to expand its “consumption-based billing” to other markets, COO Landel Hobbs said on the company’s Q4 earnings call today, in which the MSO charges $1 for every gigabyte a subscriber uses above a preset threshold.

Comcast last fall initiated a 250-Gbyte monthly maximum for all broadband subscribers. Cox limits monthly consumption for its 10-20 Mbps tier to 60 Gbytes downstream and for its 5-9 Mbps tier to 40 Gbytes downstream. (See www.cox.com/policy/limitations.asp.)

Now Charter is joining the ranks of MSOs imposing usage caps: The operator next week will set a ceiling of 100 Gbytes on subs with connection speeds of 15 Mbps or less, and 250 Gbytes for tiers between 15 and 25 Mbps. (Note that AT&T is experimenting with usage-based billing too.)

Meanwhile, the cable industry is gearing up to widen the availability of services that provide (allegedly) 50-Mbps download speeds, or faster.

TWC wants to deploy DOCSIS 3.0 in New York City (to fight Verizon’s FiOS) and other markets in 2009, according to Cable Digital News. Comcast says it’s offering “wideband” 50-Mbps down service to 10 million premises, and Charter, which is near bankruptcy, last week launched a 60-Mbps downstream DOCSIS 3.0 service that it touted as the fastest broadband service in the U.S.

Offering faster speeds while setting usage caps?

On the face of it, that’s a mixed message. It’s like leasing someone a Porsche — and then telling them to keep it parked in the driveway most of the time.

To its credit, Charter at least is exempting the $140-per-month Ultra60 tier from any bandwidth-usage limitations. And on the Comcast front, yes, 250 Gbytes is a lot of data. Comcast’s figures put it at the equivalent of 50 million e-mails or 62,500 MP3s.

The MSOs need a way to handle the corner-case users who chew up unduly massive amounts of network capacity. Cox CTO Chris Bowick related a story at SCTE Cable-Tec Expo last year about one subscriber who sucked down 1.5 Terabytes of data in one month — equal to 188 DVD movies.

On the other hand, if you download two or more feature-length HD movie per day, you’d easily blow through the Comcast cap.

Do most people download two HD movies every day? Probably not. But I imagine the average consumer wouldn’t deem that excessive. Cable companies may soon need to find another way of tackling the “bandwidth pig” problem — either by upping their caps or adding network capacity — to get over potential perception problems.

Posted by Todd Spangler on February 4, 2009 | Comments (5)

February 10, 2009
In response to: Cablers Turn on the Bandwidth Meters
Robbie commented:

Anyone have any idea how much bandwith a MMO uses? Try having 2 MMO players, and a NetFlix instant queue subscription and see how fast you burn thru any cap they put on. And regardless of the CapEX that is mentioned above, this is a communications platform, and you\’re advertising that you can provide it…. Either provide the service you claim or get out of the game.


February 5, 2009
In response to: Cablers Turn on the Bandwidth Meters
Captain Kirk commented:

I think Spock once said \”the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.\” Besides, 250GB is quite a lot for a residential customer. Sorry for the peeps on the planet Texas, 20GB is a low number.


February 5, 2009
In response to: Cablers Turn on the Bandwidth Meters
Todd Spangler commented:

"anon" - My point is that if cable companies do not deliver what they promise vis-a-vis bandwidth, or if that is even just the *perception*, they will have a customer service issue on their hands. Look at the comments of the first poster on this thread.


February 5, 2009
In response to: Cablers Turn on the Bandwidth Meters
anon commented:

You wrote: Cable companies may soon need to find another way of tackling the “bandwidth pig” problem — either by upping their caps or adding network capacity — to get over potential perception problems.

Have you ever managed a broadband network? Do you have any concept of the cost involved, the capex required? If not, get educated about what you don\’t know before telling others how to do their job.


February 4, 2009
In response to: Cablers Turn on the Bandwidth Meters
VisionOn commented:

You don\’t need to download 2 HD movies a day to beat the pitiful 20GB cap TWC implemented in Texas.

Time Warner was trying to sell everyone that SDV would be the answer to their bandwidth dilemma and they are still crawling along trying to make it work. Everywhere that FiOS isn\’t a threat TWC is a joke. Poor services, higher prices and now this.

If you\’re stuck with them as the only video source the internet was one way around it. Now they\’ve noticed that threat they are deciding to kill that alternative too.

For years TWC have sat back content to rape the consumer at the expense of services knowing they had no competition in most areas. Now their lack of attention to growing technology improvements in the rest of the market is being passed on to the consumer again. Paying more. For less.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
FS_trans_audio_160x160
Advertisement
Multichannel Subscription
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites