Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Multichannel News

Why Didn't TiVo Sue Motorola?

August 26, 2009

After failing to reach partnership deals with the two biggest U.S. telcos, TiVo filed lawsuits today against Verizon and AT&T.

TiVo is alleging their DVR services infringe on three of its patents, including the “Time Warp” patent that Dish and EchoStar were found to have violated (see TiVo Sues Verizon, AT&T For Patent Infringement).

But why isn’t TiVo suing Motorola, the hardware manufacturer of the DVRs used by both Verizon FiOS TV and AT&T U-verse TV?

Asked that question on the company’s earning call, TiVo president and CEO Tom Rogers said, “I’m not going to comment on litigation strategy as it relates to specific parties.”

However, he added, “I will say that as a general matter we have been pursuing commercial relationships with multichannel distributors. That has been our focus, and you can take away anything you want to from that comment.”

Rogers also noted on the call that TiVo has had “ongoing conversations” with Time Warner Cable about offering TiVo-based services to subscribers.

As far as its financial results, TiVo continued to suffer.

TiVo’s cumulative subscriber base dropped by 573,000 — or 16% — compared with a year ago to stand at 3.05 million as of July 31 (1.58 million TiVo-owned subs and 1.47 million through operators including DirecTV and Comcast).

Revenue fell 12% year over year, to $57.4 million for the quarter ended July 31.

The company reported a net loss of $2.9 million, compared with its previous guidance of a net loss of $6 million to $8 million and net income of $2.9 million in the same quarter last year.

For the quarter, TiVo reported $4.3 million in “MSO/Broadcasters-related service revenues.” That yields average monthly revenue per sub of 95 cents through service provider partners — versus 96 cents in the year-ago period.

Posted by Todd Spangler on August 26, 2009 | Comments (2)

August 27, 2009
In response to: Why Didn't TiVo Sue Motorola?
mcneil commented:

tivo is hoping it would be aquired by moto. they will once they hit rockbottom which is soon.


August 27, 2009
In response to: Why Didn't TiVo Sue Motorola?
Chaz commented:

Nothing would give me greater pleasure than to see Verizon adopt the TiVo interface, or at least learn from it. Having been a TiVo user for many years before switching to Verizon Fios, I feel dirty every time I pick up the remote. The user interface itself, not to mention the actual functionality, just sucks compared to TiVo. I can not adequately describe the suckiness... Really.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Fall 2009 Hispanic Guide
Advertisement
Multichannel Subscription
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites