Jimmy Schaeffler's blog

ACA: The American Cable Association’s Amazing Bandwidth

Much to the chagrin of my dear wife, several decades into my telecom life, I often find myself directly comparing real life to the telecom industry (and vice versa).

Cable Trade Groups: Where, Who, What, and Why 2012?

To truly understand an industry, one needs not only understand the people and the companies. One needs better to truly understand the parts played by a couple of other groups of important players.
One of those “groups” is the government.

Peter Jennings' First Olympics: Lessons Learned In Munich

The 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich, West Germany, was a landmark Olympics for many people in the world of television.

Because when the angst, pressure, and the stress of “getting the job done right,” reached never-before-known levels of professionalism, there were those in the Bavarian capital that year whose careers were made by what they did on that stage. Names like Arledge, McKay, Spence, Bader, Mason, Wilson, Jennett, and Goodrich come to mind; and careers were made by the Wilcoxes, Buffingtons, Goodmans, Fuchses, Browns, Katzes, McManuses, Peacocks, Gliddens, and the Ebersols of the TV world.

Another of ABC Munich’s top performers was a 34-year-old Canadian, with strong roots in Canadian broadcasting. That talent was Peter Jennings.

Peter Jennings had called ABC Sports’ executive producer, Roone Arledge, earlier in 1972, asking for a two-week leave of absence from ABC News, in order to join ABC Sports in August, as some kind of an on-air reporter at the Games. For several years before, Jennings had worked out of ABC News’ Middle East bureau located in Beirut, Lebanon, and he had been looking forward to a fresh assignment - if even just for two to three weeks. In response, Roone assigned Peter Jennings to report the traditional “cultural pieces,” akin to ABC Sports’ famous “Up Close and Personal” segments about Olympic athletes. When he approached the temporary job in Bavaria (which he expected to be more fun than anything else), Peter Jennings had no idea it would be one of the best decisions, yet most difficult events, of his life. More important, he — indeed we — learned some wonderful lessons.

Early in the two weeks before the XX Games began on August 26, 1972, I was moved from an ABC Sports work assignment as a pure, 20-year-old “Go-For” (meaning go for this, go for that…and that I painted doors and swept floors in the broadcast center), to that of a production assistant for Peter Jennings (because Jennings needed someone who could speak German). In the handful of blissful work days leading up to Sept. 5, 1972 as Peter Jennings’ “right hand man,” I discovered that I was expected to shadow Peter and his film/sound crew of three, helping wherever, and with whatever, I could.

Doing “cultural pieces” with Peter Jennings and our British-based crew meant early morning schedules, where we accompanied Peter Jennings to a motley group of places such as Dachau, the notorious World War II concentration camp; to Munich’s Hoffbrauhaus, then the city’s foremost beer hall; and to an occasional Olympic sporting event, when, with a shortage of “real sports announcers,” production schedules meant Peter’s amazing talents of reporting news were morphed slightly into volleyball or weightlifting coverage.

Indeed, early in September 1972, I found myself alone with the soundman, cameraman, and assistant cameraman (but without Peter), explaining (and apologizing) to the vice mayor of Munich why it was that I had arranged an ad hoc “Up With People” concert, without a permit, in order to make for a more lively set of pictures in the famed city center, the Marienplatz.

Because we had worked late the evening of Sept. 4, 1972, Peter told me to sleep in a bit, which meant I arrived at the ABC Sports production center, called Barnathan’s Bungalow, a bit past 8:30a that next Tuesday morning. The minute I stepped into the complex, it was clear that clouds, indeed storms, were brewing. Fear like I had never seen it was in the eyes of one of the American girl I met. She was Jewish, and had traveled to Israel. Elsewhere, instead of looking for sports events to cover, people were figuring out how to get into the Olympic Village, which is where we were told “guerillas” had taken over the Israeli residences. I had to be one of those seeking entrance to the Village, I quickly discovered, because my boss, Peter Jennings, and a film crew, were already inside covering the storm.

A close friend I lived with at the time had connections to the U.S. Olympic team, allowing me to borrow a U.S. team jogging suit, which I donned and then went immediately to the ABC Sports graphics department. There, a brilliant artist changed my grey and red production credential to the green and black of an athlete’s. Following a brief check in to the studio, where I was advised to carry several walkie-talkies, sandwiches for the crew, and fresh film for their cameras, I was on my way toward the Village gate, hoping to wend my way successfully - and unobserved — past onlookers and German military gate guards.

Yet, wouldn’t you know it, along the way, a radio reporter from Iowa stopped me for an “athlete interview,” for which I apologize today, because to keep my cover, I told a white lie and explained how I was a “weightlifter” (I had just seen that sport earlier on the studio monitor, and it was all I could think of). With somewhat long hair, and a skinny 150 pounds, I still laugh at how ridiculous that was.

On the fourth floor of the building facing the Munich Israeli residence that morning, Sept. 5, 1972, I saw my first, in-person sighting of the infamous terrorist with the white pith helmet. The rest of the day, I kept Peter Jennings and the crews as replenished, ready, and updated as possible. Jennings would work for another 20 hours that day, as we moved from one Village building to the next, trying to follow the hostages and their kidnappers. Later that evening, Peter had me speaking on a walkie-talkie to the main studio, standing beside David Wolper on the deck of his 14th story hotel, as we both overlooked the busses that took the nine  hostages and their eight captors to Furstenfeldbruck airport. Two hours later, all of the nine Israelis were slaughtered, and all but three of the Palestinians were shot dead by German snipers.

At Furstenfeldbruck the next morning, I was horrified by the huge pool of blood that encircled one of the helicopters where the Israelis had been shot and bombed. Later, in an effort to help put it all into perspective, I will never forget Peter flawlessly - and I believe without a second take - doing a typical Jennings “on camera” that so brilliantly summarized it all: “It is simply this reporter’s observation, that no act of such evil can ruin what is ultimately a successful experiment in human relations.” Those were the paraphrased words that concluded Peter Jennings’ 30-minute special, the one that we produced the day after the massacre, and that aired in the evening telecast of Wednesday, Sept. 6, 1972.

On the evening of the closing ceremonies, I had the honor of joining Peter Jennings and his future wife, Annie Malouf, at a restaurant. Because Peter knew the Palestinian sects, he was able to partially explain what faction of the Black September group had apparently committed the atrocity. He was able to explain some of their history and some of their motivations. Yet, at the end of that evening, we all still struggled with the same thing we struggle with today, following the massacre of another 12 innocents in Aurora, Colorado: Why? Indeed, unbelievably, 40 years later, I still ask why? What did it really accomplish?

Peter was reminded, and taught me, the career importance of hard work, substantial luck, occasional above-average competence, and how you treat people. Haunted himself by less than a high school education, he repeatedly urged others to go as far as they could with education. Security aimed at keeping the evil out, was yet another elemental course, because although most people are good, there are enough who are not.

My colleague at the time, Sean McManus, has since written about Munich, and pointed out how we, as Americans, probably learned for the first time what terrorism was about, when we watched the implosion of the Munich Summer Olympics on ABC. Indeed, it was the first of so many events Americans would see, that continue to haunt us today, and that struggle for more - and better — answers.

Peter and ABC learned through the Munich crisis that big story reporting was really important. And to be reporting live was the only real way to really do it right. Better still, to tell the truth and to know the real facts — and how to really articulate — is the real magic. Peter later made that his calling card. That helped make Peter Jennings the icon, and maybe the legend, he is today, many years after his death. Yet the one thing Peter Jennings did not learn that summer and fall of ‘72, was how to control his tobacco addiction, which took his life on August 7, 2005.

Post, post-script on the fallible human side: In all-too-typical “mad scientist” fashion, that rascal, Peter Jennings, wrote me a personal check for $100 that evening, after dinner, thanking me for the job I did. Excited, I took it to the bank. I found out weeks later after I thought I had cashed it: My revered “Peter Jennings Check” had bounced!

Mr. Jennings, what a pleasure it was to know you. Indeed, Petros, what a pleasure it was to work with you.

Jimmy Schaeffler is chairman and CSO of Carmel-by-the-Sea-based consultancy The Carmel Group (www.carmelgroup.com).

Olympics, Munich '72, Jennings: Post-Script # 1

Last week’s “Mixed Signals” about Peter Jennings at the 1972 Munich Olympics elicited some wonderful critiques, recommendations, and other helpful responses. These included several dialogues from the ABC Sports Alumni Association, which is a group founded by former ABC executives Bob Apter and Geoff Mason, with several hundred members today.

Of particular note were three comments from three former ABC Sports producers and/or directors, i.e., John Wilcox, Doug Wilson, and Jim Jennett. I found them helpful enough to want to restate them here, for the world at large. Indeed, if ever there were to be a Broadcasting University, with a course on “The Olympics,” a couple of fine points from the comments below — and from Geoff Mason, mentioned in a 2011 version of this “Mixed Signals” blog – would be worth considering.

Wilcox

John Wilcox was my first real boss at ABC Sports. He was also an early producer, director, and head of the ABC Sports Films unit, and later the assistant to ABC Sports’ executive producer, Roone Arledge.

Wilcox’s memories of Peter Jennings and the tragedy we experienced are perhaps the most vivid and varied of those below, in part because he worked directly with Mr. Jennings throughout the Munich Games.

Roone Arledge’s selection of Peter Jennings as the ABC Sports Munich Olympics “news” correspondent couldn’t have been a better choice, considering what happened, notes Wilcox. This was possibly luck, but more likely Arledge’s realization that the Olympics actually transcend a mere sports event in its importance to people. At some point, the Olympics become both sports and news.

Once in the hot seat of the story that became the terrorists’ capturing and killing of the Israelis, “Peter was as cool as a cucumber, and totally informative and aware of Black September,” Wilcox recalls. Yet, at the same time — and here’s that lesson for every reporter, present and future - Peter Jennings was also strikingly prudent and cautious. Wilcox’s example was a single report that came into ABC, suggesting that the Munch terrorists were planning on strapping dynamite to the hostages; Jennings would not put that on air without a second confirmation.

But perhaps most fascinating, even today, were memories of the German government and German police representative, Manfred Schreiber. Schreiber confirmed in later interviews what Jennings already recognized, which was that the 8 terrorists were certainly not amateurs. “From the beginning, Peter pointed out to everyone just how professional these gunmen were,” Wilcox recalls.

Following an on-camera interview with Manfred Schreiber in the ABC Sports broadcast studio, in the morning of September 6, 1972, Jennings and Wilcox had a chance to do that extra reporter follow-up, post-interview, and thus obtained one of the most critical pieces of news at that point. In response to a question about the involvement of the Israeli government in the September 5 planning for how to deal with the kidnapping crisis, Mr. Schreiber confirmed that the Israeli’s were certainly involved. Asked in follow-up if the Germans were told what to do by the Israelis, Schreiber answered, “No, but we followed their advise.”

Wilcox further recalls in the days following, Israeli premier Golda Meir was asked of this involvement. Her first response was to deny, but later she confirmed, direct Israeli participation. “The big thing was that a decision was made that the terrorists were not going to leave Germany. Second was that the Germans were not going to respond inside the Village. And third, they didn’t know how many terrorists there were. It wasn’t until the airport that they finally had a count,” Wilcox summarized.

Wilson

Doug Wilson, whose truest Olympic broadcast sports expertise was in figure skating (and an occasional opening and closing ceremonies), worked at ABC Sports for FIFTY years (yes, half a century!), from 1958-2008. Indeed, Wilson is currently scribing a book about his ABC Sports days, due to publish in 2013.

What Mr. Wilson recalls most fondly about Peter Jennings — coming down from Canada “…as a kid trying to be a mid-afternoon news reporter in a slot following ABC Sports’ Wide World of Sports” — was Peter’s “…being very much a regular guy, but at the same time being extraordinary.” As an example, Wilson cherishes the memory of Peter Jennings regularly joining those in the ABC employee dining room at HQs on 66th Street in NYC, rather than heading to the top of the building and the “top executives’” dining room, where most would have expected to see Jennings.

Wilson fondly recalls Peter Jennings’ penchant toward being severely self-critical, and very concerned, when he did not absolutely understand a topic he was chosen to cover. “Peter was very dedicated to the idea that what he said had value and was correct,” adds Wilson. Yet, in Munich, the opposite was true. For there, Jennings was on his firmest ground, as an absolute expert on Middle East dynamics. This today is a good one of many reasons why the Munich Games had such an impact on the people of America.

Flashing forward to the XXI Summer Olympics in Montreal, Wilson recalled a related example of Jennings’ professionalism. “ABC Sports’ film unit manager, Toni Brown, received a call, and then turned it over immediately to Peter, who was in the room at the time. It was some kook talking about how he was planning to kill Dick Fosbury, the high jumper. Peter found out the threat was bogus, right then and there, and diffused what otherwise might have been another Olympic tragedy.”

Adding one more, short tale of Jennings and the Olympics, Doug Wilson recalled a time in Calgary, during the 1988 Winter Olympics, when a final shot of a full moon over Calgary was superimposed over a shot of skater Dorothy Hamill. It was a shot that took a lot of effort, and some heroics, on the part of one of Wilson’s closing ceremonies camera crews, and although not entirely “true” (because it was superimposed after the fact), it still presented Calgary and her Olympics in a stunning light. Back at the hotel that evening, meeting by chance at the front desk, Wilson will never forget the glow in Peter’s eyes and his simple appreciation, “I want to thank you for that Canadian moon, Doug.” (Wilson never had the heart to admit to Jennings that the moon part was pre-recorded, and not quite 100% authentic).

Jennett

Jim Jennett nearly rivals Doug Wilson for ABC Sports longevity record, having served as a producer and director for over 40 years, from 1967-2008. Jennett also did his fair share of producing and directing Olympic ceremonies, and still works for ESPN today.

Joining Jennett in the broadcast booth for the L.A. Games’ opening ceremonies again was Peter Jennings. Recollects Jennett, “No matter what the Olympics, Peter always added a whole ‘nother view beyond our ‘normal’ sports perspective. He saw things we didn’t see.”

And although not Munich, the example remains a great one for future producers and directors in training: “During rehearsal, Peter pointed out that the world video shot was too wide.” “Too wide,” in this case, meant that there were not enough separate shots of the colors and splendor of specific U.S. and other athletes. Moreover, as the host U.S. Olympics broadcaster has learned repeatedly many times since, that is what Americans want to see in their U.S. Olympic broadcasts.

Summarizes Jennett, “Peter’s international personality was perfect for our Olympics. It wasn’t bad for great news, either.”

Jimmy Schaeffler is chairman and CSO of Carmel-by-the-Sea-based telecom consultancy The Carmel Group (www.carmelgroup.com).

Memo to NBC Olympics: Invoice the Republicans

NBCUniversal and its new majority owner, Comcast, paid an awful lot of money to the International Olympic Committee for the exclusive U.S. broadcast rights to the XXX Summer Olympic Games from London, which wrapped up Aug. 12.

Indeed, the combined rights-fee figure for London and the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, is believed to be some $2.1 billion. Thus, when Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign and the Republican Party decided to essentially pre-empt NBC’s second-to-last-day of Olympic morning programming, it took away a large part of what NBC had paid for. In some circles, that’s called a breach of contract.

Yet, NBC is not likely to bring suit against the elephant and its progeny, if for no other reason than this was just one of those things that happens sometimes. In addition, legally, NBC wouldn’t have much of a leg to stand on.

Yet, from a practical and professional standpoint, the GOP took NBC for granted, and NBC could sure argue for a “make-good” (another way of saying a future bargaining chip or a credit in NBC’s favor).

When the Grand Old Party let the word leak Saturday night that Wisconsin congressman Paul Ryan was to be the 2012 vice presidential nominee, it basically said to the media, “Tomorrow at 9 a.m. EST, and for about an hour, at minimum, we are taking over your airwaves with our story.”

As part of that, the GOP decided to draft on the strong audience NBC had built during the prior two weeks of the Games. The Romney camp also decided not to wait another 40 hours until the Olympics had ended. Indeed, the GOP decided to do a lot of things that especially impacted NBC and its very positive Olympics coverage with something that most were not expecting during the games — something that probably half the audience was not all that eager to absorb during the games, and something that probably could’ve waited a tiny bit longer.

So, yes, Comcast chairman and CEO Brian Roberts, you should certainly send that bill directly to Mitt Romney, today’s head of the GOP. I’m sure will be given it ample professional attention, after all, Mitt’s a businessman. And I’d imagine — especially when he has the money in the bank — that he pays his bills.





Memo to NBC Olympics: Invoice the Republicans

NBCUniversal and its new majority owner, Comcast, paid an awful lot of money to the International Olympic Committee for the exclusive U.S. broadcast rights to the XXX Summer Olympic Games from London, which wrapped up Aug. 12.

Indeed, the combined rights-fee figure for London and the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, is believed to be some $2.1 billion. Thus, when Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign and the Republican Party decided to essentially pre-empt NBC’s second-to-last-day of Olympic morning programming, it took away a large part of what NBC had paid for. In some circles, that’s called a breach of contract.

NBC is not likely to bring suit against the elephant and its progeny, if for no other reason than this was just one of those things that happens sometimes. In addition, legally, NBC wouldn’t have much of a leg to stand on.

Yet, from a practical and professional standpoint, the GOP took NBC for granted, and NBC could sure argue for a “make-good” (another way of saying a future bargaining chip or a credit in NBC’s favor).

When the Grand Old Party let the word leak Saturday night that Wisconsin congressman Paul Ryan was to be the 2012 vice presidential nominee, it basically said to the media, “Tomorrow at 9 a.m. EST, and for about an hour, at minimum, we are taking over your airwaves with our story.”

As part of that, the GOP decided to draft on the strong audience NBC had built during the prior two weeks of the Games. The Romney camp also decided not to wait another 40 hours until the Olympics had ended. Indeed, the GOP decided to do a lot of things that especially impacted NBC and its very positive Olympics coverage with something that most were not expecting during the games — something that probably half the audience was not all that eager to absorb during the games, and something that probably could’ve waited a tiny bit longer.

So, yes, Comcast chairman and CEO Brian Roberts, you should certainly send that bill directly to Mitt Romney, today’s head of the GOP. I’m sure it will be given it ample professional attention: after all, Mitt’s a businessman. And I’d imagine — especially when he has the money in the bank — that he eventually pays his bills.





Jimmy Schaeffler is chairman and CSO of Carmel-by-the-Sea-based telecom consultancy The Carmel Group (www.carmelgroup.com).

Digital Signage Exposition 2012: Growth Industry

As part of a recent client business plan - written for a client in the laundromat business, called Clean View Media Network (CVMN), wishing to use digital signage in dryer doors — we ran across a graphic that told so much about where the digital signage industry is today (and will be tomorrow).

The graphic compared the laundromat industry’s rating of “flat”, to that of the digital signage industry’s rating of “growth”. That said, literally billions in terms of the digital signage’s future revenue and growth prospects (and, interestingly, also at least many millions of dollars’ worth of unexpected growth for industries like laundromats, if new businesses like CVMN take off).

Yet, it took another recent visit this past week to the annual Las Vegas, NV confab called the Digital Signage Exposition, held March 6-9, 2012, to truly drive home the point. Not only were the attendees numbers solid, but what really caught me was the both the solid “big company” participation (e.g., Dish, DirecTV, Intel, Cisco, and Sprint), and the sense that true optimism was ‘the buzz,” rather than doubt about “will this great (digital signage) communications vehicle ever really take off?”

Moreover, in 2008, when I wrote “Digital Signage - Software, Networks, Advertising, And Displays: A Primer For Understanding The Business”, “the buzz” noted above appeared to be just quarters, or, at most, a couple of years, away. Yet, probably because of the baneful economy, and a few other missing parts like lack of a clear “amazing app,” and continued concerns about where to place the right signage message, digital signage grew, but not according to its true potential.

Today, because of lots more investment, and developments like more municipalities loosening digital signage restrictions in return for new fees and tax revenues, digital signage has legs, and true legs at that. If those implementing digital signage can remember that truest of digital signage mantras, i.e., that content for the location must forever be relevant (and therefore appropriate) to that audience and locale, the future uses of digital signage are boundless.

New Digital Signage Products

Another way I think I saw the bright future of digital signage was in the following handful of new products that were presented as part of a special DSE show tour, called the “New Product Pavilion Briefing.” The total list of new products included the names of nearly 50 companies.

• Restaurant Touch Screen Menu Tablets: Both 22 Miles, Inc.’s Interactive TouchMenu for iPad and AOpen America’s WT22M-RH Interactive Ultra-Slim Multi-Touch System, are aimed for food service-type venues, making ordering and information/entertainment for customers that much more accessible and efficient.

• Wearable Screens: Black Box’s iCompel EDS system offers a 2.4″ screen and batteries that can power the content message for at least two hours. Our demo included a in small form factor that actually was worn on a suit lapel.

• Audience Measurement: myAudience-Measure’s anonymous identification of audience gender, age, number of viewers, and attention periods, is the Holy Grail for advertisers, in that they can then judge the effectiveness of their ad pitches, and which audiences are “relevant.”

Broadcast and PayTV?

And BTW, watch for ad-supported video coming to tens of thousands of laundromats nationally beginning in May 2012. Could this be developing a new growth venue for the broadcast and pay TV industries, as well?

Jimmy Schaeffler is chairman and CSO of Carmel-by-the-Sea-based consultancy The Carmel Group.

Satellite 2012: OTT-Broadband TV Is Here, What's Next?

My 20th Satellite Name-The-Year event just came and went in Washington, DC, March 14-16.

And thus far, 2012 is already clearly a year of yearning for the world’s satellite providers. They yearn for the good old times of the past, but, more importantly, they yearn for a clearer future.

That is because on the business-to-business side, terrestrial fiber threatens to take business away in the lucrative and so-called “contribution” and “distribution” sides of the business. Put into lay terms, the CBS’ of the North American network TV business, for example, are making the Fixed Satellite Service providers like Intelsat and SES work harder for their future carriage agreements.

They are doing this by suggesting that a fiber optic provider like a Level 3, AT&T, Hibernia or The Switch can do the job of carrying an event telecast from the west coast to the east coast as well one day soon, and perhaps more cheaply, than the FSS guys do now. And that makes satellite providers nervous.

This is also because as TV shows transition from traditional satellite, cable, and telco video infrastructures to Internet infrastructures, in the form of online video offered by the Netflixes and Amazons and Blockbusters of the world, satellite providers struggle with whether and to what extent satellite will fit in. Indeed, the so-called Over-The-Top or online video transition has already clearly begun. And that makes satellite providers nervous.

Indeed, one question at a recent Satellite 2012 general session asked, “When will (or can) satellites become a seamless part of tomorrow’s telecom infrastructure?” And what was most interesting was not how the question was answered, but rather that the question was not answered.

And that is because thus far the satellite industry is still working with the broadcast, cable, and online industries to discover that perfect alliance. Moreover, that alliance, in any form, is just beginning and, arguably, is already years behind.

It’s time to catch up. And, indeed, knowing this culture as I do, my prediction is that come my 25th-30th Satellite Name-The-Year event - especially because of the huge bandwidth needs tied to video on mobile devices - the pie will have grown for each traditional stakeholder, including the satellite guys. Indeed, there are already several key solutions those stakeholders are putting in place to achieve this “seamless” solution.

Jimmy Schaeffler is chairman and CSO of Carmel-by-the-Sea-based consultancy The Carmel Group (www.carmelgroup.com). He can be reached at jimmy@carmelgroup.com.

OTTCon 2012: Santayana and Learning From The Past?

It’s been more than a decade since I saw, in person, the former head of and founder of ReplayTV.

His name is Anthony Wood, and he used to attend and speak at conferences produced by my company, The Carmel Group. We had fun reminiscing recently for a few precious moments at the 3d annual OTT Con in Santa Clara, Calif., from March 20-21

Yet, it is fascinating to note that Wood today is not so famous for his first foray into the world of digital video recorders, but rather for how he went from there to the world of add-on set-top boxes, in the iteration of today’s Roku. Some of that success comes from Mr. Wood practicing some sage advice from a well-known historian, named George Santayana.

Wood went from a bankrupt ReplayTV in 2001, to a much more financially viable Roku today, on the basis of a lot of hard work and a handful of lessons, one or two of which is worth passing along to every entrepreneurial newcomer in the telecom business today.

Indeed, one is a lesson portrayed by many a successful business person, and one that Wood would likely say he is lucky to have learned young enough in his failures at ReplayTV, to be able to take that lesson and apply it to a success at Roku.

That lesson is to remember those among the status quo, when pioneering new products and services, be they hardware, software, or something or someone else.

In the case of ReplayTV, it was a fierce rival of TiVo for dominance in the emerging DVR business, going back to the 1997-1998 timeframe (See, Digital Video Recorders: DVRs Changing TV and Advertising Forever, by Focal Press, for a more detailed account of this earliest DVR era.

And, by his own admission, what Wood and his ReplayTV team did back in this timeframe was to push changes in front of the studio status quo a bit too quickly and a bit too aggressively. This occurred to the point where ReplayTV was sued by Paramount and other studios and networks, for various copyright infringement claims. And that, in essence, helped lead to bankruptcy and the eventual demise of ReplayTV.

TiVo, on the other hand, also pushed the envelope, but simply not as aggressively, and not as carelessly. Indeed, TiVo was more respectful of the existing studios, networks, providers, operators, and content owners (which is some of why TiVo is around today and ReplayTV is not).

Which bring us full circle to the OTT Con show and Mr. Wood’s opening keynote address on March 20. When asked a question about lessons learned, his first response, somewhat humorously, was “Buy more Apple stock.” But his next, absolutely serious, response, was to “Pay a bit more attention to and work with the traditional stakeholders.”

And that, interestingly enough, is what is helping to make Roku work so well, in the 2012 version of a Wood company.

The lesson here for young entrepreneurs, a la Wood: create lots of new things and ideas, but remember to find a place at the table - a respectful and productive one — for the existing players. Indeed, as I look out at the ivi’s, the Sky Angel’s, the Aereo/Bamboom’s and, to a lesser extent, the Boxee’s, of the telecom world’s current newcomers, I can’t help but more firmly wish this “Santayana Lesson” upon them.

After all, wasn’t it Santayana who coined the phrase: “Those who cannot learn from history, are condemned to repeat it”?

Jimmy Schaeffler is chairman and CSO of Carmel-by-the-Sea-based consultancy The Carmel Group (www.carmelgroup.com). He can be reached at jimmy@carmelgroup.com.

OVD Stakeholders in OTT-Land: Internet, Mobile and Online Video Magic

Four decades ago, when broadcasters began to really have to deal seriously with cable operators as rival forms of video distributors, most observers felt the promise (or threat) of cable change was pretty obvious.

Jump forward about a decade, and the threat or change that was represented by Direct Broadcast Satellites (DBS), was in a similar category: most who knew the industry suspected it made a lot of sense and had a pretty good chance of surviving (and perhaps even thriving).

Follow DBS in 1994 by about a half of another decade and the telco video introduction of IPTV lead by AT&T and Verizon wasn’t all that tough to envision either.

Jump ahead to today, and most who understand the U.S telecom industry see the arrival of online, so-called Over-The-Top video, carried via Internet Protocol (IP) to devices everywhere, all the time, as that next rather evident transition.

Indeed, as most saw recently at the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) Show in Las Vegas, companies like ivi, Aereo nee Bamboom, and Sky Angel, are pushing the envelope consistently outward, looking to again grow the telecom pie, but this time in an entirely unique way. In conversations I had with person after person, there was a true buzz about how the NAB was going to react to the Federal Communications Commission’s request for comments on a topic that directly impacts this OTT world. This was the FCC’s 12-83 Docket, and its effort to define in the future who plays by what rules in the pay TV industry.

This week, the NAB spoke. In a seven-page comment filed and dated May 14, 2012, the NAB said it welcomed the wonderful competition and innovation that will come from allowing new stakeholders to qualify for the benefits and burdens of being to carry their programs as bona fide Multichannel Video Programming Distributors (MVPDs). The NAB added, however, almost subtly, that its constituents expect to continue to be paid fairly for that content via the retransmission rules that prevail today.

Essentially, the NAB was saying that as long as the new MVPD stakeholders play by the rules, and compensate broadcasters fairly in party-to-party negotiations, that the NAB is willing to work closely with these new MVPD stakeholders, as they do the cable, telco, and DBS operators today.

This staking out of a rather simplistic position, although fraught with complications, is a real tribute to the NAB, realizing as it does that true inevitability, and yet not mucking it up too much with long windedness or complexity, or even heavy-handed politics. I was pleasantly surprised.

The real challenge now becomes figuring out a way to get the other major existing stakeholders, such as the pay TV operators, and many of the content providers, to see the same light, and work with that same downstream flow, rather than against it.

In short, this magical change is inevitable, and Online Video Distributors (OVDs) and MVPD stakeholders playing right by that now will earn and create remarkable benefits, once that transition begins producing revenues in the next transition phase. And it will. Indeed, broadcasters seem to be one of the first ready to stand in the distribution line, and ready to negotiate.

Is cable next? Telco? DBS? Comcast, DirecTV? Time Warner? Dish? Cox? Charter? Cablevision? News Corp? NBCU? CBS? Viacom? Disney/ABC? AT&T, and Verizon?

Mike White, DBS provider DirecTV’s CEO, recently noted in an analyst call:  “So I would say you’ll see us continuing to build, but this is a long-term journey over multiple years. So, I would be clear that while we’ll look to be doing more streaming of products, we’re going to be doing more on-demand products outside the home. This is a long-term journey and I don’t think you’ll see some big transformational thing out of any of the distributors, because frankly, the rights aren’t there, and the rights are very much in a stage of evolution. So, I’m excited. We launched our dot-com with pay-per-view and premiums. We’re working on Androids and making our stuff work on Android. We’re pleased with our iPad app and how it works and our iPhone apps, but you’re going to see a multi-year journey here as we expand TV Everywhere. (emphasis supplied)

Indeed, if ever I needed a reminder of why I tagged my column “Mixed Signals,” this topic spells it. It appears DirecTV might be one of the first to magically adapt, but the others? Well, magic awaits.

Jimmy Schaeffler is chairman and CSO of Carmel-by-the-Sea-based consultancy The Carmel Group (www.carmelgroup.com).

Syndicate content