mcn_admin's blog

Flash: Rep. Doesn't Get Together With Prostitute

Rep. Peter King (R-NY), chair of the House Homeland Security Committee, took a gentle shot at media outlets Sunday Sunday while making an unusual annoucement.

The headline on the release from his office–”King Declines Request to Meet with Columbian Prostitute”–was one of the more unusual ones, and really needed the context of the Secret Service scandal. Without that, it suggested that not meeting with prostititues is sufficiently unusual in Congress to warrant a headline and a press release on a Sunday morning. We won’t go there.

“I have declined a request to meet with one of the female foreign nationals involved in the Secret Service misconduct in Colombia,” King said. While he was approached about a meeting, he said he decided to instead have his staff communicate with her through her attorney.

Why?

“While such a meeting — and the inevitable circus atmosphere surrounding it — would no doubt be of great interest to the media covering this story, ” he said, “a meeting with her is simply not necessary at this time for the Committee to conduct a serious and thorough investigation.”

Darn it, we were ready to sell peanut and clean up after the elephants.

Video Competition Report Circulated

The FCC circulated its long-awaited video competition report to the commissioners for their vote on Wednesday, according to several FCC sources. The report concludes, among other things, that online video has become a “thriving industry.”

The “annual” report (see below) covers developments in the video program market between 2007 and 2010. The term “annual” has been interpreted loosely. The FCC’s last report was in 2009, and that was the 2006 report.

According to one source who had skimmed the summary of the latest, 200-plus report — it had only been circulated an hour before — the report appeared to move away from weighing in on how competitive the marketplace was or wasn’t to outlining the competition that there was, as it has done with the wireless and satellite competition reports, said the source. “They do not seem to be saying it is not competitive,” said the source with the chuckle of one who will have to read all those 200-plus pages to find out just what it does say.

That is good news for cable operators if the alternative, as was the case in the last report, again was to cite that increase in competition, but conclude that it was not a sufficient governor on cable pricing. But it was bad news if the commission did not look at all that competition and conclude it should at least rethink some cable regs.

The report divides video programmers into three categories: MVPDs, broadcast TV stations and online video distributors, examining each individually. But it clearly portrays online video as a player.

“One of the most significant trends since the last report related to the increased importance of digital technology, consumers rising demand of access to video programming anywhere anytime, and the evolution of online video from a niche service into a thriving industry.”

Congress imposed the annual reporting requirement in the 1992 Cable Act to review the state of competition in the video programming marketplace. Cable operators argued in comments on the latest report that congressional mandates in the 1992 Cable Act on rate regulation, program access, program carriage, leased access, PEG access, cable ownership restrictions and more are now “relics of a bygone era” because competition has been “unquestionably” achieved.

The last report talked about how cable prices had risen faster than the inflation rate. One positive sign in the report was that a search for “inflation” turned up no hits. The last report talked about how cable prices had risen faster than the inflation rate. One positive sign in the report was that a search for “inflation” turned up no hits.

Group Hug

Google’s logo today June 6 is an animation celebrating the drive-in theater, but the Motion Picture Association of America used it as an opportunity to urge Google to come back to the table on content-protection legislation.In a blog posting MPAA Chairman Chris Dodd said he loved the animation, but added that protecting film and TV content “takes more than just a gorgeous piece of animation….It’s discouraging to hear Google executives say they “have done as much as they possibly can” when in fact the theft of American products around the world is rampant - and often facilitated by their search engine.”

Google was one of the driving forces behind an effort that eventually derailed the bipartisan Stop Online Protection Act (SOPA) in the House and Protect IP Act (PIPA) in the Senate.

“[L]et’s hug it out,” says Dodd, and get back to the table. “It is long past time to develop a meaningful, collaborative solution to a problem that protects American workers and consumers while also protecting a secure internet.”

Calls for hugs and table talk notwithstanding, legislation is highly unlikely before the election and the next Congress.

The 'Promise' Of Broadband

Today’s (June 7) hearing on USF reform in the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs was one of the more compelling hearings on a seemingly arcane subject that I have witnessed. Tribal leaders and smaller telecom companies are worried that the FCC’s migration of legacy support from some smaller telecom carriers as part of larger USF reform could endanger long-term loans and broadband service to native American communities.

They looked at the USF funding as a government promise–with which long-term loans were secured from yet another government agency–and part of the repayment of a special debt owed their people, a promise that it looks to them like the government is breaking, to potentially “devastating” effect.

Can you blame them for worrying that the government might not make it a priority to insure tribal telecom interests are protected, or take at face value government promises to that effect.

I have no doubt that the FCC’s intentions are the best here. Tackling USF reform was a hydra-headed challenge no previous commission had the intestinal or political fortitude to tackle, and cutting legacy subsidies is going to leave some scars. But the commission must be very careful not to have that discomfort fall inequitably on tribal telecom. If there was ever a time for the government thumb to be even slightly on the scale–and there almost never is–this would be it.

We hope there was some form of miscommunication, but one witness at the hearing, the Honorable Alfred LaPaz,

Councilman of the Mescalero Apache Tribe of New Mexico, said that he had once been told by an FCC official that because Native Americans were not mentioned in the Communications Act, the FCC did not have to honor the federal government’s “trust relationships” with Native Americans.

I believe that characterization has been brought up before in another venue, but it didn’t sound any better this time around. This FCC has repeatedly stressed the importance of telecom on tribal lands, and Michael Copps, who voted to approve the USF reforms, was nothing if not a passionate advocate for Native American communications rights.

Seeing tribal leaders and telecom companies talking dispiritedly about a complicated and cumbersome government waiver process, not knowing whether they will get the waivers, or if those will be sufficient to keep their companies out of bankruptcy was, frankly, hard to watch.

My advice to the FCC is to make sure that it provides a waiver process that is not too expensive or cumbersome to be of real use, and that it make sure it is providing all the guidance it can. Yes, I know there are budget constraints, but this is one place not to pinch pennies.

Should government loans to tribal telecoms secured by USF funds have been grandfathered? There may be some reason why not, but I can’t come up with a good one at the moment.

Public Interest Or Public Relations?

While the FCC and Justice Department may believe it was concentration and competition concerns that prompted them to deny the $39 billion AT&T/T-Mobile deal, the Public Relations Society of America seems to thinks PR had something to do with it as well.

The Glen Echo group received a Silver Anvil Award from the PRSA (not to be confused with the Silver Hammer award for remembering all the lines to the Beatles song), for its “No Takeover Project,” the company said Friday.

The campaign was backed by competitors Sprint and Cricket as well as deal critics Public Knowledge, Media Access Project, The Future of Music Coalition, and others.

The Silver Anvil award, which is given for PR that “forges” public opinion (get it?), goes annually to “organizations that have successfully addressed a contemporary issue with exemplary professional skill, creativity and resourcefulness.”

Sort of like a PR version of a Scout merit badge in deal blocking.

The 'Promise' of Broadband

Thursday’s hearing on USF reform in the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs was one of the more compelling hearings on a seemingly arcane subject that I have witnessed. Tribal leaders and smaller telecom companies are worried that the FCC’s migration of legacy support from some smaller telecom carriers as part of larger USF reform could endanger long-term loans and broadband service to native American communities.They looked at the USF funding as a government promise - with which long-term loans were secured from yet another government agency - and part of the repayment of a special debt owed their people, a promise that it looks to them like the government is breaking, to potentially “devastating” effect.

Can you blame them for worrying that the government might not make it a priority to insure tribal telecom interests are protected, or take at face value government promises to that effect.

I have no doubt that the FCC’s intentions are the best here. Tackling USF reform was a hydra-headed challenge no previous commission had the intestinal or political fortitude to tackle, and cutting legacy subsidies is going to leave some scars. But the commission must be very careful not to have that discomfort fall inequitably on tribal telecom. If there was ever a time for the government thumb to be even slightly on the scale - and there almost never is - this would be it.

We hope there was some form of miscommunication, but one witness at the hearing, the Honorable Alfred LaPaz,

Councilman of the Mescalero Apache Tribe of New Mexico, said that he had once been told by an FCC official that because Native Americans were not mentioned in the Communications Act, the FCC did not have to honor the federal government’s “trust relationships” with Native Americans.

I believe that characterization has been brought up before in another venue, but it didn’t sound any better this time around. This FCC has repeatedly stressed the importance of telecom on tribal lands, and Michael Copps, who voted to approve the USF reforms, was nothing if not a passionate advocate for Native American communications rights.

Seeing tribal leaders and telecom companies talking dispiritedly about a complicated and cumbersome government waiver process, not knowing whether they will get the waivers, or if those will be sufficient to keep their companies out of bankruptcy was, frankly, hard to watch.

My advice to the FCC is to make sure that it provides a waiver process that is not too expensive or cumbersome to be of real use, and that it make sure it is providing all the guidance it can. Yes, I know there are budget constraints, but this is one place not to pinch pennies.

Should government loans to tribal telecoms secured by USF funds have been grandfathered? There may be some reason why not, but I can’t come up with a good one at the moment.

Names

I was proud to be a journalist covering television Sunday.

The TV and radio coverage of the 9/11 memorial services In New York and Washington and Shanksville, Pa., was as diverse and moving as the names being read at Ground Zero, an honor roll but also families talking directly to their loved ones, a father who loved Gummy bears, a son that the world had seen as a single person, but for whose mother had been the whole world, a request for a last game of golf together in heaven.

The coverage I saw managed to capture the general and specific of the tragedy, tastefully, extensively, and yes, beautifully.

Essentially the networks were all covering the same thing, but in very different ways. It was a rainbow, rather than a roadblock, of memorial coverage.

CBS concentrated on the reading of the names. It was Sunday morning, after all, and it has made a franchise out of taking contemplative pauses on Sundays to focus on the sounds and images of life rather than narrating them. That ever-present litany was like the bagpipe drone in a rendition of Amazing Grace, with the other notes, the grace notes of moving interviews, the jarring strains of archival footage, provided by other networks.

When I switched to Fox, it was a Chris Wallace interview about how we should be treating weapons of mass destruction in the newly fragile Libya ten years after the attacks. I switched to NBC, which was covering Vice President Joe Biden’s remarks at the new Shanksville memorial to Flight 93. ABC was interviewing the son of a flight 93 victim whose father was a pilot and who, he was sure, would have been able to bring the flight down safely had he gotten the chance. Back to CBS for more names, then to Headline News for video from ten years before, legislators singing God Bless America on the steps of the Capitol, Republicans and Democrats not at each others’ throats but at each others’ sides.

Back to Shanksville. The Vice President talked of the pain of the victims, their courage of reliving the day publicly. He said he knew the feeling of getting a call that takes a loved one away, not having to add how much his mother’s death had affected him. But he also made the point, echoed elsewhere, that it was he who was honored to be in their company.

Back to the roll of names on CBS, read by alternating pairs of victims’ relatives. They were names, but then they would get to the end of their section, when they added the name of their father or mother or daughter or uncle or aunt, and an anecdote or a shared catchphrase, and it was suddenly heartbreakingly personal. “Give pop a hug and a kiss for us all.”

John Hendricks, founder of Discovery Communications, gave the Keynote at the Pennsylvania memorial, talking about Liz Waino, the Discovery Channel Stores executives who was on the flight. He talked about the need for a global communications effort to combat the misunderstanding and hate that culminated in the attacks. Amen to that.

Names.

Back at CBS for a single-flute version of Amazing Grace that soared and pierced at the same time. More names. Among the names was O. Kristin Osterholm White Gould. She was 65, a freelance journalist and author. I was immediately struck by how many roots and branches and leaves of family trees were part of that name. Multiply the victims by the the lives their pasts and presents touched, and by the potential lives that now will never be, and the victims number in the millions.

I was only to the ‘G” names when I had to leave, a little after the last bell tolled at ground zero (at 10:28) marking the fall of the second tower, so that I could take bins full of Encyclopedias (lists of names again) to my Mother-in-Law.

I turned on the car radio and flipped to the noncommercial station in time to hear Paul Simon perform Sounds of Silence.

Then over to C-SPAN radio for more names, and still more names. Then a sudden uneasiness as I saw a plume of grey smoke rising to the sky up ahead. It was an RV engulfed in flames, but I was suddenly reminded of my drive in to work on 9/11. I was listening to WMAL(AM) as I passed the Pentagon at just about the time that they were cutting to an ABC Radio report of an apparent small place collision with one of the Twin Towers. At almost that exact spot, I noticed on a commute a few days later, there are a pair of towers, apparently part of the Pentagon heating or cooling plant, two white, rectangular towers just visible over the guard rail, with an everpresent plume of steam that billows from one and floats eerily across the other.

I didn’t get back for over two hours, and the names were still being tolled. And, reportedly for the first time, being rubbed onto sheets of paper by relatives and friends from the raised names on bronze plagues on the Memorial walls that now define the empty–but not negative–spaces at Ground Zero, spaces once filled with all those lives and all that promise.

Over to CNN, where they were profiling Michael Hingson and Roselle, the service dog who helped her master down 77 floors worth of steps to safety.

Names.

The simple reading of the names is what affected me most deeply and sometimes without warning–bringing the unexpected clutch at the throat and wet eyes (that and a Winnie the Pooh bear lying on the cold stone of one of the memorial walls). Names of seemingly every nationality: Abraham and Isaac, Addams and Washington, Kim and Gonzalez and Ishikawa and Jean-Pierre and Schmidt and Grabowski and Morabito and Green and DeLucca and the string of “Kelly’s” that reminded us, if we could ever forget, of all those New York City Firemen who defined their lives when they climbed when others were descending. Yes, it is about time for the interoperable broadband communications network, or whatever we need to do as a country, to insure our first responders have at least as smart a communications device as an eight-year-old at the shopping mall.

There were plenty of images, of course, ghosts from the past of smoking towers, the disbelieving faces, the heads buried in their hands. There was the President and First Lady in a long shot, standing in a field at Shanksville dwarfed, perhaps only by perspective, by tall yellow flowers. I thought of another President in Pennsylvania as a killing field was being turned into a memorial cemetery. “We can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract.”

Names.

During the New York ceremony, former New York Governor George Pataki read the last stanza of the Poem, “The Names,” by Billy Collins, Poet Laureate at the time of the attacks.

“One name spanning a bridge, another undergoing a tunnel.

A blue name needled into the skin.

Names of citizens, workers, mothers and fathers,

The bright-eyed daughter, the quick son.

Alphabet of names in a green field.

Names in the small tracks of birds.

Names lifted from a hat

Or balanced on the tip of the tongue.

Names wheeled into the dim warehouse of memory.

So many names, there is barely room on the walls of the heart.”








The poem made me think of my own brother, Al, who was in the Pentagon but survived because he was sitting in this desk, and not that one. Names in a hat.

Life goes on, as it must. The roll of names ended, a little while after NFL football’s 1 p.m. kickoff, which itself had been proceeded by huge flags rolled out across those other green fields. Quarterback Ben Roethlisberger of Pittsburgh sandwiched between uniformed heroes at the edge of one flag, patting it as gently as those big hands can. Chants of “USA!,” The National Anthem–that opening-day moment where everything is possible for every team. And then a Sunny Sunday afternoon with enough clouds to remind us of those we lost and enough blue sky to remind us how wonderful life can still be.

I took another break to ride my bike down by the lake and survey the damage from last week’s floods from the remnants of Lee , a tropical depression that seemed to hit harder than Irene the week before. The pavement of the Lake parking lot had been lifted in strips and carried away, the bicycle path was blocked by downed trees where it had not been redirected in sheets of tar and gaps of gravel. Where the creek bent around the ball fields, the batting cages were filled with mud, the fields furrowed by stumps and trees that had warped and twisted the backstops in an eerie reminder of that other twisted metal.

But I knew as certainly as we have rebuilt, if not entirely recovered, from that terrible day ten years ago, that kids are going to playing in that ball field next spring. And we will be parking in that parking lot, just on more grass and less asphalt.

Families of every color were out kicking soccer balls and cooking burgers and probably hugging their kids just a little tighter. As I rode by, the rear tire on a Jeep said it best. “Life is good.” Yes is is.

But we will never forget.

Approval, Of Portion, of Net Neutrality Rules To Be Published...We Think

The seemingly endless paperwork of getting the FCC’s network neutrality rules into effect is almost over, but not quite.According to the FCC, look for the Federal Register Wednesday (Sept. 21) to publish the Office of Management and Budget’s approval of the paperwork-related portions of the new rules, which were adopted by the FCC last December but have yet to go into effect.

Any rules that require additional paperwork, as the net rules do, must have those portions approved by OMB per the Paperwork Reduction Act.

But that is not, we repeat, not, the publication that triggers the 60-day clock on the effective date of the rules or the filing of lawsuits.

That won’t come until the actual rules are published in the Federal Register, which is will likely not be fore a few more days.

After that, suits can be filed, the clock starts, Katie bar the door, all bets are off, and other similar phrases.

Guest Blog: Allocate the D-Block

A guest blog from David Paulison, former director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) from 2005 to 2009. He is currently for senior partner with consulting firm Global Emergency Solutions.

I write to offer a different opinion to Chairman Greg Walden’s (R-Ore) op-ed on the spectrum auction of D-block. Some key factors were overlooked in Mr. Walden’s argument. The Congressman is correct that the Congressional Budget Office anticipates that the auction of D-block would bring $2.7 billion to government coffers. However, he does not mention that because the D-block is adjacent to existing public safety broadband spectrum, it will cause public safety users grave interference problems - since public safety relies on mission critical voice this problem will need to be mitigated immediately. This mitigation will cost $3 billion to $5 billion. Is Mr. Walden asking that we in the public safety community foot that bill so a commercial entity can profit from more spectrum?

As for jump starting the economy and creating jobs, I agree with the Congressman - building-out the D-block for use will generate jobs and help move toward a more robust U.S. economy. What Mr. Walden fails to note is that the process of auctioning the D-block will take at least 18 months and the winning bidder will decide when to build. In contrast, allocating D-block for public safety’s use will create jobs now - we are eager to participate in building-out a public safety broadband network that will provide us the capacity and interoperability we need to protect American lives.

Mr. Walden’s legislation calls on the conversion of public safety’s 700 MHz narrowband to broadband. On paper this comes across as an innovative solution, but overlooks the problems and high costs of moving public safety users currently on the narrowband off of this spectrum during conversion and then returning them post-conversion. It also fails to acknowledge that many in public safety only recently purchased systems to operate on this narrowband. Forcing them to convert to broadband use means mandating the purchase of new broadband equipment - yet another unfunded mandate from Washington.

The second impediment to Mr. Walden’s narrowband conversion proposal is that mission critical voice on broadband will not be available for at least five years. The standards bodies that create the rules around open access and multiple sourcing have not even started work on the standard that mission critical voice would be built upon.

While Mr. Walden contends that only a “few public safety officials have started using some portions of the 24 MHz” allocated to them in the 700 MHz band, the reality is that there are currently 246 licenses representing 5,500 public safety agencies using the 700 MHz narrowband channels for mission critical voice operations. Public safety is using this spectrum through the deployment of mission critical standards based P25 networks that are interoperable. Again, what do we do with the thousands of radios and hundreds of systems that are on those channels now if that spectrum is co-opted for conversion to broadband?

Further, the concept that public safety does not need more spectrum is simply untrue. Nationwide public safety currently pays commercial carriers $2 billion annually in roaming fees because many public safety agencies routinely reach capacity. Modern digital capabilities designed to help first responders save lives will require more spectrum in the future to capitalize on these improvements. The public safety community is asking for a mere two percent of the total 500 MHz that the Federal Communications Commission says will be needed.

Finally, during the recent East Coast earthquake, call processing on commercial networks was significantly impacted, and these delays lasted more than an hour. Public safety’s mission critical voice radio systems performed as expected with little or no outages or delays. However, mission critical data networks that were operating on carrier networks suffered delays similar to those of commercial voice. Clearly this is not the level of survivability that is needed or expected on public safety mission critical networks.

I join with thousands of other first responders and public safety personnel in asking Congress to provide us with one of the key tools we need to do our jobs: allocate D-block to public safety and help us to protect property and save lives.

Mixed Signals

At least in Washington, the FCC’s coordinated national test of the Emergency Alert System at 2 p.m. Wednesday seemed to be all over the map.

Of course, the test was an effort to reveal any issues, and it may have.Unless I had my mute button on, I did not hear the tone when I tuned to the test on one channel. And the alert had must have already ended on WRC, though one viewer said they had seen a crawl but got no onscreen graphic, while on another channel it was still going on (WTTG), while on yet a third (WJLA), it seemed to go on for close to the three minutes initially planned by the FCC, but later adjusted to 30 seconds. Yet another viewer said they thought the WJLA test had only lasted 30 seconds after all.

The National Cable & Telecommunications Association and AT&T had both warned the FCC that there might be some issues with the test, which NCTA had asked be postponed. NCTA said Wednesday it did not have any results, but reminded reporters that it had sent a letter to FEMA, which partnered with the FCC on the test, requesting the delay and pointing to the potential problems.

“We are in the process of gathering feedback from our member companies about today’s first-ever test of the national Emergency Alert System (EAS),” said NCTA in a statement. “We do know that in many places, the Emergency Alert Notification flowed through to viewers without a hitch. However, we also know that in some places, it did not.

“Today’s test was designed specifically to identify the gaps among all EAS participants that exist in the current alert system. In the coming days and weeks, we’ll continue to work closely with FEMA and the FCC so that we can collectively identify the specific cable industry gaps and determine how they can be addressed in the future. And we remain committed to implementing the next generation alert system which will be deployed by all EAS participants by June 2012.”

An FCC spokesman was not available for comment on what the FCC had learned from the first national test of the system.

“Our initial feedback is that most radio and television stations ran the Nationwide EAS test successfully although some isolated glitches may have occurred, said the National Association of Broadcasters in a statement. “We look forward to continuing to work with our federal partners to diagnose and improve the EAS system.”

Syndicate content