State Laws/Franchising

AT&T Files Four More Lawsuits

Four more Chicago suburbs were sued by AT&T Inc. for delaying plant improvements that will lead to a launch later of the telephone company's video service.

The new defendants are Itasca, North Aurora, Wood Dale and Geneva. Suits were filed against the Illinois communities May 2 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Previously, AT&T sued the communities of Carpentersville, Roselle and Wheaton, Ill., as well as two communities in California.

Law ‘Carves Out’ Santa Cruz

While the new legislation in California will allow incumbent cable operators to seek state operating authority, one system won’t be filing anytime this decade.

That would be Charter Communications’ Santa Cruz County system.

Though not named in the newly passed legislation, specific terms in the bill target the system and prevent it from taking advantage of the new policy until July 2014.

Calif. Franchise Bill Becomes Law

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a state franchising bill into law late last week, stating that the bill will "add another significant player into the cable-television marketplace and help to speed the spread of new and innovative technologies across the state.”

New entrants will now apply for a single statewide franchise, to be administered by the state Public Utilities Commission. Schwarzenegger signed the legislation Sept. 29.

Time Warner Cable Targeted in Kansas Lawsuit

Subscriber Says Required Cable Box Rental Violates Antitrust Laws

'Verizon Bill’ Is Now Pa. Law

Amendment Puts A Curb on Towns’ Ability to Overbuild

Stevens Supports Cable-Indecency Law

Senate Commerce Committee chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) said Tuesday that he would support legislation that applied broadcast-indecency rules to cable and required cable to carry multiple digital-broadcast signals if the extra channels are public-service-related.

Stevens said cable content is riddled with filth and there is no reason why Congress can’t include cable within the indecency rules.

“I’m going to meet with the cable people early next month, and I intend to tell them that,” he added.

Lawyer: Brand X Case About Cable Blocking

Washington -- The Supreme Court case on the regulation of cable’s high-speed-data service is “massively important” and “about search engines not having to pay cable companies to get favored treatment or being discriminated against because Yahoo! [Inc.] has paid for faster treatment and Google [Inc.] can’t get it,” attorney Andrew Jay Schwartzman said Wednesday.

Barton Calls for a Telecom-Law Overhaul

Washington— House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) wants a top-to-bottom overhaul of telecommunications law, saying Internet technology and broadband distribution require an entirely new regulatory model.

“I believe that the best thing to do is just start from scratch,” Barton said last Tuesday. “The broadband age is such that it doesn’t really fit easily into any of the existing categories and so we probably ought to just start over.”

Lawmakers Concerned About 2006 DTV Bill

Las Vegas -- Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mont.) and several House members Monday expressed strong opposition to cutting off analog broadcasting at the end of 2006 when millions of consumers still don’t have the ability to view digital signals.

“I’ve got to protect my people in the state of Montana, because there will be a lot of televisions turned off,” Burns said. “We’ve got to make sure that we don’t turn off a lot of television sets in America whenever we make this conversion.”

Texas Challenges New Franchise Law

The showdown between cable and telephone companies in Texas has moved to federal court, as incumbent system operators attempt to overturn a new state law reforming franchising requirements for new market entrants.

Syndicate content