Distribution

Cable Ops Tell FCC DBS Should Pay Up

Say commission should be unpersuaded by satellite arguments 7/11/2017 3:11 AM Eastern

Smaller cable operators are telling the FCC that nothing DBS operators have told it should dissuade the commission from its plan to raise the regulatory fees satellite operators pay to get them closer to cable fees.

That came in reply comments on the FCC proposal.

Cable operators are still paying 150% more per subscriber than satellite-TV providers -- 96 cents versus 38 cents -- under the FCC's proposed 2017 regulatory fee schedule.

Related > ACA to FCC: Cable, DBS Should Have Regulatory Fee Parity

The FCC has been phasing in its decision of three years ago to start assessing per-subscriber fees on DBS operators, as it does on other MVPDs (it used to assess a much lower, per-license, fee), but the ACA suggested in initial comments that he agency needs to get the lead out.

The FCC set the DBS fee at 12 cents per sub in 2015, then 27 cents in 2016, and now the proposed 38 cents.

For its part, DBS operators Dish and DirecTV told the FCC in a joint filing that the increase from 12 cents to 38 was an unsupportable and "staggering 217% boost. "[T]he Commission has failed to explain how regulatory developments in the last year justify a dramatic rate increase for the third consecutive year," Dish and DirecTV parent AT&T told the commission.

They said there is evidence in the record that two DBS operators "have never generated, and do not generate now, anything approaching the regulatory costs that hundreds of cable operators do."

ACA was certainly unpersuaded.

It said that if the entire 11 cent bump were passed through to subs, it would only translate to less than one sent per month per subs at a time when Dish and DirecTV had just boosted sub fees by several dollars, saying:" [T]heir claims that a less than one cent per month regulatory fee increase is harmful rings hollow."

ACA said the public interest benefit in regulatory parity between cable and IPTV and DBS was all about "competitive fairness," rather than one competitor subsidizing another. "Any alleged harm to DBS from a slight bump in regulatory fees would be more than offset by the public interest benefit of lower regulatory fees paid by tens of millions of cable and IPTV subscribers combined," it said.

The DBS operators argue that they do not engage FCC staffers--the fees are based on the number of full-time employees (FTEs) it takes to regulate a particular service. ACA said countered that "all payors in the Cable/IPTV fee category have imposed and continue to impose similar burdens on Media Bureau resources used to administer MVPD regulation..."

Want to read more stories like this?
Get our Free Newsletter Here!