Calif. Late-Fee Challenges Linger

Author:
Publish date:

California cable operators thought they’d put an end to late-fee challenges in 1997, when they convinced the state to enact a law specifying that companies could charge tardy payers $4.75.

But attorneys for consumers are just completing a round of class-action lawsuits against cable companies for late-fee billing practices dating back to 1997. The lawsuits contend the companies violated state law by linking franchise-fee payments to late-fee revenue.

“We were surprised when someone found a loophole in the law,” said Larry Goldberg, an outside attorney for Charter Communications Inc.

A single suit, seeking class-action status, was filed against the state’s major operators, fostered by the Utility Consumers Action Network, a consumer-watchdog group. It was later broken up into separate class actions that have led to settlements as large as $461,000, paid by Comcast Corp., according to plaintiff’s attorney Jonathan Weiss.

The suits aren’t about generating a lot of money for consumers. In the case against Charter, a tentative settlement pending in Los Angeles County Superior Court would refund to California consumers as little as 24 cents apiece.

“It’s about taking the profit out of violating the law,” Weiss said.

In the Charter action, one of two class actions still unresolved, UCAN claimed the company violated state laws against unfair and deceptive trade practices by collecting a 5% franchise fee, or 24 cents, on the $4.75 late fee.

The lawsuits sought consumer recovery back to March 1996, but the court limited the period to between January 1997 and the present.

Charter’s tentative settlement amount is $187,318.38, which is 82.5% of the amount the plaintiffs could have received at trial.

Charter vice president and senior counsel for litigation Larry Christopher stressed that the company has admitted no wrongdoing. He said Charter was happy with the settlement to end the litigation. “To the extent customers believe they’ve been hurt, we want to make them whole,” he said.

Time Warner Cable and Cox Communications Inc. have settled cases using similar formulations, Weiss said. The suit against bankrupt Adelphia Communications Corp. was not pursued.

Comcast settled regarding its video customers, but is still fighting over the treatment of customers who buy high-speed Internet service only.

Related